We performed a comparison between Iron Mountain Connect and NAKIVO Backup & Replication based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Backup and Recovery solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."The most valuable feature for me is the policy management capabilities"
"All in all, NAKIVO helped us save a lot of time."
"The ability to create a replica of all virtual machines is a great feature."
"The price is much lower than competitors that do the same function."
"The solution has a user-friendly interface and is easy to configure."
"The upgrade process is manual but very simple to do."
"Before using Nakivo Backup & Replication, all our data backup processes took a long time and did not optimize the disk space reserved for backup. With the introduction of Nakivo Backup & Replication, saving times have been reduced by almost half (thanks to the use of several simultaneous transporters) and the space occupied has also had a very important reduction."
"It can be quickly configured via web pages."
"For my purpose, I find VM Backup to be the most useful, as it gives me the ability to create image-based, incremental backups of VMware, Hyper-V, and Nutanix AHV VMs."
"I would like to see more integration with different platforms."
"Compression and data deduplication are okay, but they could be improved."
"While the solution provides mostly what we need, it would be ideal if there were some additional feature capabilities for the API."
"The way encryption is currently working could be improved. Currently, it's not possible to encrypt the backup to an NFS share directly. It needs to have the encryption within the Transporter/VM to enable encryption, which isn't optimal. So I'm hoping that in the near future this function will be implemented."
"It would be great if the product could be expanded to support other virtual technologies."
"UI could use some upgrades. The UI is basic, but functional."
"We'd like to see a legacy environment backup, like AIX, etc."
"More statistic options would be a great feature."
"Space is always an issue."
Iron Mountain Connect is ranked 39th in Backup and Recovery with 2 reviews while NAKIVO Backup & Replication is ranked 6th in Backup and Recovery with 85 reviews. Iron Mountain Connect is rated 8.6, while NAKIVO Backup & Replication is rated 9.4. The top reviewer of Iron Mountain Connect writes "Good policies related to data". On the other hand, the top reviewer of NAKIVO Backup & Replication writes "Good deduplication, easy to configure, and offers a free version". Iron Mountain Connect is most compared with IBM Spectrum Protect and Veeam Backup & Replication, whereas NAKIVO Backup & Replication is most compared with Veeam Backup & Replication, Hornetsecurity Altaro VM Backup, Acronis Cyber Protect, Rubrik and Zerto. See our Iron Mountain Connect vs. NAKIVO Backup & Replication report.
See our list of best Backup and Recovery vendors.
We monitor all Backup and Recovery reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.