We performed a comparison between IronNet Collective Defense Platform and Qualys VMDR based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Darktrace, Vectra AI, Auvik and others in Network Traffic Analysis (NTA)."The most valuable feature is the ease of use and the full reach of services."
"The reporting is fine."
"This is one of the best products I have worked with so far. I like the power of Qualys, and it's a better solution because you can scan a compact file, a BIT file, or batch files. The product already knows what's happening inside, and you don't need to expand the package. Tenable will do the same thing, but you need to have a package issuance claim. With Qualys, we can immediately understand the file, even a compact file. If there's some kind of discovery or incident, you will know what happened in the environment."
"The most valuable feature of Qualys Container Security is the detailed information in the reports and the remediation. This is done to make sure there are no vulnerabilities."
"I am impressed with the VMDR feature."
"Great web application security for scanning."
"Vulnerability management is the most valuable one and it’s a must in every organization."
"Monitors workstations and servers for vulnerabilities and creates reports."
"The vulnerability management feature is what I used the most. It is a good SaaS product. It is easy to use. It has a nice UI where you can see all the assets and vulnerabilities."
"I would like to see it integrate with third-party systems."
"Qualys VM should improve its methodology."
"The only improvement I can think of is on the implementation side. At times it is a bit slow."
"When tested on Zero day, there were errors."
"It's quite complex on the way it is set up, so it takes a fair bit of time in order to get your head around it in order to deploy it. Once you've deployed it, then you're never confident on the versions of the browsers and the SSL certificates, etc. You have to always go back into Qualys and check."
"The disadvantage of working with Qualys is that the graphical interface is quite outdated."
"Qualys VM's scanner doesn't pick up every vulnerability, so we have to use multiple scanners to cover that gap."
"The price could be better. Asset view is still a legacy feature. I'm not able to extract the information about the asset with complete details. It would be better if they fixed that in the next release. I know Qualys is already working on it, so I'm hopeful it will be available in the next five or six months. That would be something that's changed where I seek improvement."
"I would like to see this solution simplified to work more easily in a multi-cloud environment."
More IronNet Collective Defense Platform Pricing and Cost Advice →
Earn 20 points
IronNet Collective Defense Platform is ranked 16th in Network Traffic Analysis (NTA) while Qualys VMDR is ranked 3rd in Risk-Based Vulnerability Management with 77 reviews. IronNet Collective Defense Platform is rated 0.0, while Qualys VMDR is rated 8.2. The top reviewer of IronNet Collective Defense Platform writes "Easy to use, stable, and easy to install". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Qualys VMDR writes "Good visibility but expensive and needs better support". IronNet Collective Defense Platform is most compared with Darktrace and ExtraHop Reveal(x), whereas Qualys VMDR is most compared with Tenable Nessus, Tenable Security Center, Rapid7 InsightVM, Microsoft Defender Vulnerability Management and Tenable Vulnerability Management.
We monitor all Network Traffic Analysis (NTA) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
