We performed a comparison between Ivanti Neurons for RBVM and Tenable Security Center based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Tenable, Wiz, SentinelOne and others in Vulnerability Management."Most of the features are similar to what other tools have, but the UIs are quite user friendly. A beginner could use it."
"The scans are the most valuable aspect of this solution."
"The most important features are the dashboard and reporting. The dashboard provides statistics with graphs and bar charts for our management."
"The solution is very intuitive and the dashboards are simple to use."
"The most valuable features of Tenable SC are scanning, reporting, dashboards, and automation."
"The tool's dashboard and reporting capabilities match our company's needs since we are able to modify the basic view to create a new dashboard, and it works out very well for our needs."
"The feature we've liked most recently was being able to take the YARA rules from FireEye and put them into Tenable's scan for the most recent SolarWinds exploit. That was really useful."
"The most valuable features in Tenable SC are scanning and analysis."
"The usability is really good. It's very easy to use and a good platform. It is scalable and very stable. The technical support is fine and the setup is super easy."
"I would also like to see more integrations, plugins, and user-friendly automation, similar to the multiple integration scripts that Rapid7 has."
"The biggest issue I have with the solution is when I'm using the scanning it picks up the original DNS of that device. That means, before we image it and actually change the DNS to something within our company structure, it'll just be random numbers and letters and Tenable will stick to that DNS for a long time."
"Certain aspects require manual effort, such as exporting and analyzing data for our dashboards. The built-in components of the Tenable solution are somewhat clumsy that require external tools. So, this is an area of improvement."
"The solution should include compliance-based scanning."
"The pricing is reasonable, but this could be brought down more aggressively, such as we see with Rapid7, Tenable SC's main competitor."
"Tenable SC could improve by making the creation of the initial reports easier that correspond to our network."
"If I want to have a very low-managed scan policy, it's a lot of work to create something which is very basic. If I use a tool like Nmap, all I have to do is download it, install it, type in the command, and it's good to go. In Security Center, I have to go through a lot of work to create a policy that's very basic."
"At times we have had the typical bugs."
"The reporting side can be improved. The dashboards are nice, but exporting things out for reports for management was a little tough."
Ivanti Neurons for RBVM is ranked 32nd in Vulnerability Management while Tenable Security Center is ranked 1st in Vulnerability Management with 48 reviews. Ivanti Neurons for RBVM is rated 9.0, while Tenable Security Center is rated 8.2. The top reviewer of Ivanti Neurons for RBVM writes "Useful for vulnerability management with many integrations". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Tenable Security Center writes "A security solution for vulnerability assessment with automated scans". Ivanti Neurons for RBVM is most compared with Cisco Vulnerability Management (formerly Kenna.VM), Qualys VMDR, Rapid7 InsightVM, Tenable Nessus and Vulcan Cyber, whereas Tenable Security Center is most compared with Tenable Vulnerability Management, Qualys VMDR, Tenable Nessus, Rapid7 InsightVM and Horizon3.ai.
See our list of best Vulnerability Management vendors.
We monitor all Vulnerability Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
