We performed a comparison between Ivanti Virtual Web Application Firewall and Microsoft Azure Application Gateway based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about F5, Citrix, HAProxy and others in Application Delivery Controllers (ADC)."The most valuable aspect of this solution is that it is simple to deploy. The deployment took us ten minutes."
"The pricing is quite good."
"It does an excellent job of load balancing."
"The solution is easy to set up."
"The most valuable feature of the solution is the web application firewall (WAF)."
"It is a scalable solution...The installation phase of Microsoft Azure Application Gateway is very easy."
"The most valuable features of Microsoft Azure Application Gateway are the policies, the data store they are using, and the cloud platform it operates on."
"We chose this solution in the first place because it has access to Layer 7. I can control the requests and the content, which I can access on my network if I want to even if it's forbidden access to other external resources. If I want to monitor, for example, traffic, and apply this rule on Layer 7, I can do so. This was our main goal when implementing this application. We wanted to take advantage of the Gateway capabilities."
"The most valuable feature of the solution is traffic management."
"In terms of what needs improvement, the price could be lowered. We've tried to deploy more of them but our purchasing department has said that they're way too expensive and they would prefer to use something else."
"The pricing of the solution is a bit high. The solution should offer different pricing systems."
"The configuration is very specific right now and needs to be much more flexible."
"The security of the product could be adjusted."
"The solution doesn’t support wildcard-based and regular expression-based rules."
"I believe that there is room for improvement in terms of additional functionality. It is an advantage to have features readily available for configuration without needing customer-defined rules."
"It could be easier to change servicing."
"Application Gateway’s limitation is that the private and the public endpoint cannot use the same port."
"There is room for improvement in the pricing model."
More Microsoft Azure Application Gateway Pricing and Cost Advice →
Earn 20 points
Ivanti Virtual Web Application Firewall is ranked 18th in Application Delivery Controllers (ADC) while Microsoft Azure Application Gateway is ranked 4th in Application Delivery Controllers (ADC) with 40 reviews. Ivanti Virtual Web Application Firewall is rated 9.0, while Microsoft Azure Application Gateway is rated 7.2. The top reviewer of Ivanti Virtual Web Application Firewall writes "Good feature set and is simple to deploy ". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Microsoft Azure Application Gateway writes "High stability with built-in rules that reduce alerts and are easy to configure". Ivanti Virtual Web Application Firewall is most compared with F5 BIG-IP Local Traffic Manager (LTM), NGINX Plus, Citrix NetScaler and Avi Networks Software Load Balancer, whereas Microsoft Azure Application Gateway is most compared with AWS WAF, Citrix NetScaler, F5 Advanced WAF, Azure Front Door and Cloudflare Web Application Firewall.
See our list of best Application Delivery Controllers (ADC) vendors and best Web Application Firewall (WAF) vendors.
We monitor all Application Delivery Controllers (ADC) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.