We performed a comparison between JBoss ESB and Red Hat Fuse based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about IBM, MuleSoft, Software AG and others in Enterprise Service Bus (ESB)."The solution is very easy to use. I can download the trial version and just give it a go."
"The installation is quite okay. We don't really change much in the configuration. Most of the time, most of the settings remain with the default and we are able to handle our needs using the default setting."
"It's very lightweight. There's no need for any specialized tools in order to deploy any service for Red Hat Fuse."
"The process workflow, where we can orchestrate and design the application by defining different routes, is really useful."
"One of the features I found most valuable in Red Hat Fuse is that it has a lot of containers so you won't have to worry about load balancing. In the past, there was a cut-off, but nowadays, Red Hat Fuse is moving off of that, so my team is utilizing it the most for load balancing, particularly running goal applications and three to five containers. There's automatic load balancing so you won't have to worry too much. I also found that component-wise, you don't have to do much coding in Red Hat Fuse because everything is configurable, for example, XML-based coding. Coding isn't that difficult. Performance-wise, I also found the solution to be quite good and its processing is quite fast. My team is processing a huge amount of data with the help of Red Hat Fuse."
"With a premium, one can get support 24 hours."
"The most valuable feature is the software development environment."
"The stability has been good."
"This solution's adaptability to our use case has helped us integrate our systems seamlessly."
"The EPA, from what I understand, lacks a lot of features and it doesn't really know how to interface with legacy systems or how to develop APIs for legacy systems."
"What needs to be improved in Red Hat Fuse is on the development side because when you use it for development purposes, it lacks a user interface compared to what MuleSoft has, so it's a bit difficult for users."
"The monitoring experience should be better."
"The documentation for Fuse can be improved because, while it is very detailed and extensive, it is not too intuitive for someone that has to deliver some kind of troubleshooting services. In particular, for installation, re-installation, or upgrades, I find that the documentation can be improved."
"The pricing model could be adjusted. The price should be lower."
"While it's a good platform, the pricing is a bit high."
"Our clients would like to see the user interface improved so that it is more user-friendly."
"I would like to see more up-to-date documentation and examples from Red Hat Fuse."
"The testing part, specifically when running it in the cloud, could be improved. It's a little bit complex, especially considering its cloud nature."
Earn 20 points
JBoss ESB is ranked 14th in Enterprise Service Bus (ESB) while Red Hat Fuse is ranked 4th in Enterprise Service Bus (ESB) with 23 reviews. JBoss ESB is rated 7.0, while Red Hat Fuse is rated 8.2. The top reviewer of JBoss ESB writes "Easy to use with flexible pricing, but needs more flexibility surrounding integrations". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Red Hat Fuse writes "Configurable, doesn't require much coding, and has an automatic load balancing feature, but its development features need improvement". JBoss ESB is most compared with Mule ESB, Oracle Service Bus, IBM Integration Bus and webMethods Integration Server, whereas Red Hat Fuse is most compared with Mule ESB, IBM Integration Bus, Oracle Service Bus, WSO2 Enterprise Integrator and webMethods Integration Server.
See our list of best Enterprise Service Bus (ESB) vendors.
We monitor all Enterprise Service Bus (ESB) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
