We performed a comparison between Jira and Parasoft Development Testing Platform based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) Suites solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."I like that Jira allows you to customize the flow for an agile process and adapt it to your own flow."
"In terms of the general way that the tool functions, it seems like it's a pretty good fit-for-purpose for what we're trying to do. We've never thought about replacing it with another technology."
"Offers a common language set so we can bring people into projects and get them up and running almost immediately."
"JIRA stores history of changes, which helps a lot to track who, when, and why the issue was modified."
"The solution is extremely stable."
"We use it for capacity planning. We need to gauge and assess whatever is coming to our pipeline and then everything comes to the pipeline, appears as a pic, and then based on that, we create the story points and we take it from there."
"We integrate Jira with QRadar which is helpful."
"It also works well with all the integrated tools that you buy."
"It really helps developers execute scenarios through DTP and share reports/results across the teams."
"The most valuable feature is code coverage."
"I do know the initial setup was pretty complicated. The user interface could be better organized and easier. "
"Its search and reporting can be improved. They are already nice, but they can be further improved."
"There are a limited number of gadgets accessible in Jira; thus, additional ones should be supported."
"Adding applications is very expensive."
"The support could be improved."
"Sometimes the screens can be a bit too busy. There's often a lot of information on the screen. I think paring things down and applying some UX improvements might enhance the look and feel of the interface."
"When you first start to use the interface, it is confusing."
"Improvements in Jira for the next release could include adding AI tools for dashboarding, making it easier to report insights, and enhancing business intelligence capabilities. It should also improve on-prem support. As far as I know, Jira's on-premise support is being discontinued. From last year onward, they stopped providing on-premise licenses and now only offer cloud support. This shift happened gradually, and I believe they now only offer cloud licenses."
"Parallel execution: It would help it multiple executions could be done at the same time."
"The solution's speed has room for improvement."
Jira is ranked 1st in Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) Suites with 266 reviews while Parasoft Development Testing Platform is ranked 15th in Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) Suites with 4 reviews. Jira is rated 8.2, while Parasoft Development Testing Platform is rated 8.6. The top reviewer of Jira writes "A great centralized tool that has a good agile framework and is useful for day-to-day planning, task management, and work log efficacy". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Parasoft Development Testing Platform writes "Provides 100 percent code coverage, is stable, and scalable". Jira is most compared with Microsoft Azure DevOps, IBM Rational DOORS, OpenText ALM Octane, Rally Software and Polarion ALM, whereas Parasoft Development Testing Platform is most compared with Codebeamer. See our Jira vs. Parasoft Development Testing Platform report.
See our list of best Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) Suites vendors and best Application Requirements Management vendors.
We monitor all Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) Suites reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.