We performed a comparison between Jira and PTC Integrity Requirements Connector based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about IBM, Atlassian, Siemens and others in Application Requirements Management."I can use Jira Query Language (JQL) to write queries to see the stories that are there for the current sprint. I can also sort them by assignment. I also use Jira is for burndown charts, which give an indication of how efficiently the squad is performing. I also use the Active Sprints function and a feature called Planning Poker."
"The solution is very scalable and flexible."
"It has an easy UI that can easily plug-in to every level."
"It is a complete solution. It has more features as compared to other tools, especially the open-source one that we use. It is also easy to administer."
"The feature that I have found most valuable is its ease of use. I don't need to train anyone to use it, I just give them access and they can use it to add comments, move their issues, change the status, monitor, read, and so on."
"All departments can work with the same platform."
"We have the best community to support any problems that we have."
"We love the bulk edit feature. Jira also integrates well with Bitbucket."
"It is a stable solution...I rate the support a nine out of ten."
"In general, although we use JIRA, we never really learned how to use it properly. The learning curve of the solution is high. It has a lot of power, and yet we don't understand its capabilities."
"The performance is not so good sometimes. I know that fully depends on the implementation and the IT environment of Jira or the version of Jira installed. The performance is sometimes not so good. I would like to have a better response time from the Jira server. And it fully depends on the administration side of the Jira."
"The initial setup was a bit problematic in terms of getting access to Jira. That goes for a few users, including me."
"We'd like to use it with non-Agile projects in the future, however, right now, it is a very Agile-focused product."
"The way to configure it can definitely be improved. It is very difficult and complex to configure. Its configuration should be simplified."
"it would be helpful to have a better tutorial for learning and to have a better understanding of what the features are and what they do."
"Jira is a little bit old fashioned, it could be more user friendly."
"The solution can improve by including test management functionality in a native bundle without plugins."
"The training material for PTC Integrity should be made a little bit easier or more useful for the user."
Jira is ranked 2nd in Application Requirements Management with 266 reviews while PTC Integrity Requirements Connector is ranked 6th in Application Requirements Management with 1 review. Jira is rated 8.2, while PTC Integrity Requirements Connector is rated 8.0. The top reviewer of Jira writes "A great centralized tool that has a good agile framework and is useful for day-to-day planning, task management, and work log efficacy". On the other hand, the top reviewer of PTC Integrity Requirements Connector writes "A requirement management tool that provides a good technical support along with stability". Jira is most compared with Microsoft Azure DevOps, IBM Rational DOORS, OpenText ALM Octane, Rally Software and Polarion ALM, whereas PTC Integrity Requirements Connector is most compared with IBM Rational DOORS and IBM Rational DOORS Next Generation.
See our list of best Application Requirements Management vendors.
We monitor all Application Requirements Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
