We performed a comparison between Jitterbit Harmony and SAP Cloud Platform based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about MuleSoft, Microsoft, Oracle and others in Integration Platform as a Service (iPaaS)."Jitterbit provides the ability to quickly map data between files and databases."
"It is a scalable solution."
"It is very easy to build integrations and processes to pull and push data."
"Jitterbit handles the most lines of data in a .csv and loads the quickest of any data loader I have tried."
"We only use small parts of the solution, however, the parts that we use are quite adequate."
"Easy integration with Salesforce"
"The fluid user interface (probably the most user friendly interface, when compared to its competitors)."
"It runs like an appliance and has tremendous throughput."
"The solution can scale."
"The product captures data in real time."
"One of the best features of this solution is that it is web-based and you can log in and work on it from anywhere."
"Great Integration Suite, with CPI being its stable component."
"The features I found most valuable are the integration options."
"We primarily utilize SAP's ERP capabilities."
"To be able to define multiple sub accounts in order to accommodate and separate development, test, and productive environments."
"It is a stable solution, as I never encountered issues when using it."
"Looping through complex data structures can be difficult."
"In the past few months, there have been some server downtimes during work hours that have affected some critical scheduled integrations."
"I know with Salesforce updating the UI like they did, it slowed it down a lot."
"Sometimes we experience disconnections and I have to close all Jitterbit programs."
"I would like the ability to offer a dedicated cloud version for security."
"You need to have some development skills or hire a Jitterbit engineer to make changes."
"Its API management capabilities need improvement."
"There were some bugs in the product. For example if you run a delete query and test, it deletes the actual data."
"The solution’s pricing could be improved."
"I can’t speak to features that may be missing."
"The tool's UI is not very intuitive for cloud integration, so it needs research to understand its options and how it may work."
"I would like for it to have integration to GitHub."
"Lacks flexibility in its licensing structure."
"They are still developing this product. It does not really have 100% of the necessary features available to properly service business clients"
"In person, when the development happens, we were told that it's flexible and customizable. However, sometimes, it's challenging to customize."
"The product's price is an area of concern where improvements are required."
Jitterbit Harmony is ranked 13th in Integration Platform as a Service (iPaaS) with 13 reviews while SAP Cloud Platform is ranked 4th in Integration Platform as a Service (iPaaS) with 38 reviews. Jitterbit Harmony is rated 8.6, while SAP Cloud Platform is rated 7.8. The top reviewer of Jitterbit Harmony writes "An easy-to-setup solution with good stability ". On the other hand, the top reviewer of SAP Cloud Platform writes "Provides seamless integration with CTI for streamlined data synchronization but complexity and challenges in migrating existing applications to the low-code model for custom application development". Jitterbit Harmony is most compared with Microsoft Azure Logic Apps, Azure Data Factory, Mule Anypoint Platform, MuleSoft Composer and SnapLogic, whereas SAP Cloud Platform is most compared with Amazon AWS, Microsoft Azure, Google Cloud, webMethods.io Integration and Mule Anypoint Platform.
See our list of best Integration Platform as a Service (iPaaS) vendors.
We monitor all Integration Platform as a Service (iPaaS) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.