We performed a comparison between Katalon Studio and UiPath Test Suite based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Test Automation Tools solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."It is a good tool and provides all the essential features for our business requirements."
"I personally like the 'Object Spy' feature of this tool. It makes it easy to find an element on the web page."
"The basic framework and project organization is very good."
"The most valuable feature of Katalon Studio is that everything can be managed from one platform."
"It has been good so far for API testing on Mac. It is not that hard to learn and use. There is so much support out there, so if anyone wants to start using it, there is enough help."
"The product provides ease of automation for the cloud."
"The best feature is the split up between test cases and the test object. This allows us to easily change an error."
"Katalon Studio's biggest advantage is its price. It's a good tool for the price, albeit with some limitations when you compare it with tools like Tricentis Tosca."
"Our team used to require five to six days to complete the entire release or execution cycle. Now, we're able to complete it within just one or one and a half days."
"It facilitates the delegation of control to multiple users and offers an efficient way to organize tasks using labels."
"We can generate our own workflow. In our case, it is a report on the PDF file. In the reporting category, we generally verify a couple of things and generate a lot of reports at the end of the day. It provides some useful details about the data captured from the PDF that we can put into an Excel file."
"In terms of integration with other lifecycle tools and applications, UiPath Test Suite works very well because of the basis of RPA, and how RPA and automation can handle different applications and different areas of expertise."
"It's effective at testing whatever automation we've built or making sure the automation we've built is working fine."
"Being able to use regular expressions, activities, and attributes is valuable."
"The console, in a single pane, allows us to understand where we are in the testing environment."
"It is a very scalable product."
"We have had some issues when it comes to stability, which is something that needs to be improved."
"One improvement would be if it could support more programming languages such as JavaScript or Python. Right now, it is only on Groovy, which I think is not a too popular language."
"The Object Spy is rather frustrating to work with, so I tend not to use it."
"It should start working on Silverlight automation."
"Currently, I'm the only one who can use it because I have a Mac. It is giving a hard time to my team members who are on Linux. My team members are using Linux, and Katalon doesn't support Linux very well. It keeps on crashing. It crashes and shuts down almost every time they save their work, so they are not able to use it. It should have good support for Linux. We don't know what the problem is. If the Katalon team can pick up this issue, it will be very helpful."
"What it lacks is the Selenium Grid capabilities."
"My recently-updated Katalon studio version hangs a lot and is not a stable version."
"I would like to see improvements in how Katalon Studio works with iOS applications, especially with React Native applications."
"The reporting could be improved. Often, we need to email a report to higher management, we can directly get the report from there. Also, the error reporting could be better."
"They could improve the visualization of the product."
"I don't rate its ability to automate very well."
"We are facing problems specifically with Desk Manager."
"UiPath’s Test Suite manual testing doesn’t work for our organization based on how the QA Analysts do their manual testing and the artifacts that are needed for deployment."
"Our primary application is built on Windows, so we've faced no significant challenges. However, I think mobile automation is one area where the solution still needs some work."
"UiPath needs to improve its Test Manager feature. Defect management and reporting also need improvement."
"The test manager component could be improved."
Katalon Studio is ranked 3rd in Test Automation Tools with 42 reviews while UiPath Test Suite is ranked 6th in Test Automation Tools with 17 reviews. Katalon Studio is rated 7.8, while UiPath Test Suite is rated 7.8. The top reviewer of Katalon Studio writes " Functional automation features and the recording functionality saves time but the performance and script execution is slow ". On the other hand, the top reviewer of UiPath Test Suite writes "Can be used by non-developers, and saves us time, but the manual testing needs improvement". Katalon Studio is most compared with Tricentis Tosca, Postman, OpenText UFT One, Testim and Appium, whereas UiPath Test Suite is most compared with Tricentis Tosca, OpenText UFT One, SmartBear TestComplete, froglogic Squish and Eggplant Test. See our Katalon Studio vs. UiPath Test Suite report.
See our list of best Test Automation Tools vendors and best Regression Testing Tools vendors.
We monitor all Test Automation Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.