We performed a comparison between LogRhythm SIEM and Quest InTrust based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Splunk, Wazuh, Datadog and others in Log Management."AXON has the ability to add and compare use cases."
"The artificial intelligence engine."
"We now have a central point of monitoring for all potential threats."
"The dashboards in the LogRhythm SIEM really help us as a starting point. It gives us a starting point we can go to every day. We walk through several dashboards to see anomalous activity for further investigation."
"It seems like it will scale easily with the way our environment is set up."
"It allows us to automate a lot of things with a smaller team."
"Its ability to work with all different sorts of log sources has been extremely valuable."
"We have to be able to show the evidence, and LogRhythm does a great job of putting it forward and making it easy to create reports with nice looking dashboards, which show off what we are doing as a security program."
"I would rate the technical support very well as they are knowledgeable and quick to respond."
"We need to get better training for things like creating code and playlists. The way it's done now takes a long time."
"We do about 750 million a day and some days we do 715 million. Some days we do 820 million or 1.2 billion. But there's no way to drill in and find out: "Where did I get 400,000 extra logs today?" What was going on in my environment that I was able to absorb that peak? I have no way to identify it without running reports, which will produce a long-running PDF that I have to somehow compare to another long-running PDF... I would like to see like profiling behavior awareness around systems like they've been gunned to do around users with UEBA."
"The log storage capacity should be increased."
"I would like to see support added for Exchange 2016, and CheckPoint OPSec Lea."
"I would probably look for more things to go into the web console that is currently on the fat client."
"My big thing is the easability. I don't like to go to two different systems. The fat client that you have to install to configure it, then the web console which is just for reporting and analysis. These features need to collapse, and it needs to be in a single solution. Going through the web solution in the future is the way to do it, because right now, it is a bit cumbersome."
"Sometimes, the tool fails to get the correlated events that triggered the alerts."
"The software needs to work on its pricing."
"It was very complex. There was poor native correlation. "
"It needs to have better reporting. "
Earn 20 points
LogRhythm SIEM is ranked 7th in Log Management with 166 reviews while Quest InTrust is ranked 57th in Log Management. LogRhythm SIEM is rated 8.4, while Quest InTrust is rated 8.0. The top reviewer of LogRhythm SIEM writes "The solution reduced our investigation time from days to hours and assists in managing our workflows". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Quest InTrust writes "Technical support is knowledgeable and quick to respond". LogRhythm SIEM is most compared with IBM Security QRadar, Splunk Enterprise Security, Wazuh, LogRhythm Axon and Microsoft Sentinel, whereas Quest InTrust is most compared with Change Auditor for Windows File Servers.
See our list of best Log Management vendors.
We monitor all Log Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.