We performed a comparison between LogRhythm SIEM and ThreatConnect Threat Intelligence Platform (TIP) based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Splunk, Microsoft, Wazuh and others in Security Information and Event Management (SIEM)."The daily alerts allow me to quickly find security and operations issues which need to be addressed."
"It has helped us centralize and have better visibility into devices on our network. We are better able to respond to threats in a timely manner."
"We have to be able to show the evidence, and LogRhythm does a great job of putting it forward and making it easy to create reports with nice looking dashboards, which show off what we are doing as a security program."
"The feature that makes it usable is the web interface."
"The Web Console is my favorite. It enables me, at a glance, to see the health of the environments."
"It allows us to automate a lot of things with a smaller team."
"Provides visibility into the network."
"We use this solution to examine disparate log sources and provide a cohesive method to search for anomalous behavior."
"The most valuable features are ease of use and the ability to customize it."
"It's a solid platform and is stable enough. It is not complicated and is easy to use."
"ThreatConnect has a highly user-friendly interface."
"The product automatically generated a threat score based on the maliciousness of an IP."
More ThreatConnect Threat Intelligence Platform (TIP) Pros →
"We need to get better training for things like creating code and playlists. The way it's done now takes a long time."
"We're still struggling to get a real return on it and finding something that isn't false noise."
"It will definitely help if the parsing side would be much easier, meaning it would be better if we could easily make adjustments on the parser, both on standard and non-standard log sources."
"In terms of blind spots, we are looking for more improvements since we don't have visibility over everything."
"It should be improved for automated setup and auto-configuration. There should be ease of integration and ease of setup."
"We would like to see more things out of the console into the web UI. I guess this is what they are doing in 7.4."
"I would like to see support added for Exchange 2016, and CheckPoint OPSec Lea."
"We've had issues with scaling and local support."
"I couldn’t get any training videos online when I was working with the tool."
"Integration is an area that could use some improvement."
"They should make it a little bit easier to generate events and share them with the community"
"It would be good to have more feeds and more integrated sources for enrichment."
More ThreatConnect Threat Intelligence Platform (TIP) Cons →
More ThreatConnect Threat Intelligence Platform (TIP) Pricing and Cost Advice →
LogRhythm SIEM is ranked 6th in Security Information and Event Management (SIEM) with 166 reviews while ThreatConnect Threat Intelligence Platform (TIP) is ranked 4th in Threat Intelligence Platforms with 4 reviews. LogRhythm SIEM is rated 8.4, while ThreatConnect Threat Intelligence Platform (TIP) is rated 8.0. The top reviewer of LogRhythm SIEM writes "The solution reduced our investigation time from days to hours and assists in managing our workflows". On the other hand, the top reviewer of ThreatConnect Threat Intelligence Platform (TIP) writes "The tool could be integrated into any environment, but it was expensive, and the deployment process was complex". LogRhythm SIEM is most compared with IBM Security QRadar, Splunk Enterprise Security, Wazuh, LogRhythm Axon and Microsoft Sentinel, whereas ThreatConnect Threat Intelligence Platform (TIP) is most compared with Anomali ThreatStream, Recorded Future, ThreatQ, Palo Alto Networks Cortex XSOAR and Anomali Match.
We monitor all Security Information and Event Management (SIEM) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.