We performed a comparison between MEGA HOPEX and SAP Enterprise Architecture Designer based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about LeanIX, Sparx Systems, erwin by Quest and others in Enterprise Architecture Management."Customer support is fantastic. They are very helpful whenever we get on the line with the support team."
"What I find the most valuable is the process workflow. It is really good."
"The most valuable feature of this solution is the reuse of common enterprise components and entities."
"We have many use cases for this solution but the feature I have found most valuable is the IT Portfolio Management module."
"The platform is stable."
"You do not need to be a professional of enterprise modeling to contribute to the enrichment and improvement of the enterprise repository."
"I find the IT portfolio management very valuable and helpful."
"The solution is scalable. If a company needs to expand it, it's completely possible to do so."
"Traceability is a fantastic feature."
"Needs a friendlier import/export to other modeling tools."
"The tool's UI should be more user-friendly."
"It takes a long time to learn how to use HOPEX. It's hard to work with it because the user interface is bad. For example, if you want to build a complex system diagram, you need a lot of knowledge to do this correctly and make it readable. In MEGA, you need to create a report and it takes a long time to publish it. The publishing is offline. With RDoC, everything is online."
"In my experience, I've encountered difficulties with consuming custom packages in MEGA HOPEX, which leads to redundant work when deploying them to production. This is an area where improvement is needed. While version six offers better UI and UX, resolving this issue should be a priority. I believe it's important to fully explore MEGA HOPEX's capabilities before suggesting new ones."
"This product is expensive and would be improved by lowering its price."
"Better documentation and training would be helpful."
"It would be great if this solution could integrate with other tools such as ITSM (ServiceNow) or CMDB."
"Scalability can be a problem sometimes."
"The algorithm is outdated and should be upgraded."
MEGA HOPEX is ranked 4th in Enterprise Architecture Management with 37 reviews while SAP Enterprise Architecture Designer is ranked 18th in Enterprise Architecture Management with 1 review. MEGA HOPEX is rated 7.8, while SAP Enterprise Architecture Designer is rated 8.0. The top reviewer of MEGA HOPEX writes "Interactive with good functionality and helps with productivity". On the other hand, the top reviewer of SAP Enterprise Architecture Designer writes "Great training available with traceability a key feature". MEGA HOPEX is most compared with Sparx Systems Enterprise Architect, LeanIX, ARIS BPA, Visio and Avolution ABACUS, whereas SAP Enterprise Architecture Designer is most compared with SAP PowerDesigner.
See our list of best Enterprise Architecture Management vendors.
We monitor all Enterprise Architecture Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.