We performed a comparison between Meraki SD-WAN and Nutanix Flow Network Security based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Cisco, Juniper, Aviatrix and others in Software Defined Networking (SDN)."The product does have a variety of features we can work with."
"I can manage it very well and in a very easy way."
"This product contributed to a huge benefit in our bottom line on operational costs."
"I like the entire set of features and the analytics."
"Meraki SD-WAN is a scalable solution because changes are being made to the solution, enabling it to work in different environments."
"Meraki SD-WAN is stable and the performance is good."
"The most valuable feature of Meraki SD-WAN is the Auto VPN."
"The solution is very stable."
"Nutanix Flow is straightforward to install. You only need to select a checkmark that you want to enable Nutanix Flow."
"We appreciate the fact that this solution allows us to segregate two virtual machines that are in the same cluster."
"It allows for policies that enable complete visibility and traffic control."
"Nutanix Flow has a lot of data protection features. It's also valuable for operations and management. It's a big solution that works well with different solutions and is suitable for most business cases."
"The network view was excellent as it allowed us to expand the server view and visualize all connections it made within the environment. This was particularly useful in identifying the path of our data and not just its location within the data center."
"It is a very stable solution. Stability-wise, I rate the solution a ten out of ten."
"Nutanix Flow Network Security is a simple solution that is usable, easy to understand, and easy to deploy."
"Flow Network Security's most valuable features are user-friendliness, the console, and policy creation."
"The default classes should be expanded."
"This solution can only support up to two WAN ports."
"The adoption of endpoint services or endpoint security should be developed in future releases."
"Some systems use some applications with the wrong data application. It bypasses the network, and you need to block that application on Meraki. We first try to put in passwords to do it and the network is not really safe. It's not 100%, the network can be bypassed."
"Overall, we are satisfied with the support, although I cannot state this unequivocally."
"The interface in the VPN management system can be a bit complex for users to understand."
"An area for improvement would be to add 4G bonding and allow Meraki devices to support dual 4G SIM cards."
"The solution needs a multi-use provider portal."
"The most difficult part is the configuration of the initial blueprints."
"While the graphical interface of Nutanix Flow Network Security could have been improved, and some of the reporting features needed extra work, the product's features were similar to VMware's NSX. The difference lay more in the presentation and user interface."
"I would rate Flow Network Security's stability seven out of ten - it could be improved."
"The solution’s pricing could be improved."
"Nutanix Flow's networking features could use some improvement. Also, I don't know if it's currently supporting load balancing or not."
"For customers who are running Nutanix Flow and AHV, the largest area for improvement is in the disaster recovery environments. To automate the populate of rules from one side to the other side in case of disaster you report everything on the disaster recovery site, and you have all the rules automatically applied. This was something that was being built when I left Nutanix. It might already be available. Additionally, the usability of the rules editor could improve."
"The documentation offered by the product is an area with certain shortcomings where improvements are required."
"We would like the reporting functionality of this solution to be improved."
More Nutanix Flow Network Security Pricing and Cost Advice →
Meraki SD-WAN is ranked 1st in Software Defined Networking (SDN) with 61 reviews while Nutanix Flow Network Security is ranked 4th in Microsegmentation Software with 8 reviews. Meraki SD-WAN is rated 8.2, while Nutanix Flow Network Security is rated 9.2. The top reviewer of Meraki SD-WAN writes "Very stable security, great service, and the best for VPN management". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Nutanix Flow Network Security writes "Offers great integration capabilities and helps design a disaster recovery plan". Meraki SD-WAN is most compared with Cisco SD-WAN, VMware SD-WAN, Omada Cloud SDN, Cradlepoint NetCloud and Megaport, whereas Nutanix Flow Network Security is most compared with VMware NSX, Illumio, Akamai Guardicore Segmentation, Prisma Cloud by Palo Alto Networks and Cisco Secure Workload.
We monitor all Software Defined Networking (SDN) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
