Microsoft Azure File Storage vs Wasabi comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Microsoft Logo
5,971 views|4,883 comparisons
97% willing to recommend
Wasabi Technologies Logo
3,970 views|2,599 comparisons
71% willing to recommend
Comparison Buyer's Guide
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between Microsoft Azure File Storage and Wasabi based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out in this report how the two Public Cloud Storage Services solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI.
To learn more, read our detailed Microsoft Azure File Storage vs. Wasabi Report (Updated: May 2024).
772,649 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use.
Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pros
"The initial setup is straightforward and takes approximately twenty minutes.""Integration with the entire Azure platform.""The solution is easy to use.""The interface is very good.""The storage in this solution is excellent.""Its simplicity of use is most valuable. It's easy to start working with it and understand it. It's easier to transfer files between different users. I'm able to move files from my device to my manager's device without any issues or without facing any problems in between.""The tool offers a secure way to access storage. You can also easily share the files securely across Azure.""The biggest advantage of Azure File Storage vis-à-vis other public cloud storage providers, and why we recommend Azure first and foremost, is that many of our customers have partnerships with Microsoft and so they have access to better cloud economics. Compared to AWS, we have found that (from a customer perspective) Azure is much more competitive."

More Microsoft Azure File Storage Pros →

"The tool is very user-friendly.""The most valuable feature of Wasabi is the backups.""Wasabi is an easy-to-use solution.""The most valuable feature of Wasabi is its cost.""Basically, I set Wasabi up and forget it. I'll monitor it every once in a while just to make sure that it's working correctly.""We can store our videos on hot storage, allowing immediate access to them.""The initial setup is straightforward."

More Wasabi Pros →

Cons
"The product name keeps changing. It can be confusing when product names change frequently, especially with Microsoft. Sometimes, if you refer to a product by a certain name last year, it might have a different name six months later.""One thing that Azure File Storage could help us with is some kind of impact assessment. When we talk to some of our larger customers who have between 500 and 1,000 applications, we normally do an assessment of all these applications and then tell them which ones are ready to be lifted and shifted, and which ones need to re-architected. It would really help if Azure File Storage could come up with a better way to give estimations of the total investment required, including all costs incurred during the migration.""Microsoft Azure File Storage is not that scalable. Once you reach the boundaries, you need to migrate to another solution.""If the file is large, there may be a delay in download time.""They should make the solution more user-friendly.""Lacks integration with other platforms.""The storage account key could be a security issue.""The product must provide better security functions."

More Microsoft Azure File Storage Cons →

"The solution must allow the extension of the retention period.""Setting up users on the appliance should be improved.""Having the ability to upload and download data using third-party apps such as Mega which can sync to the desktop would be excellent.""The scalability could improve.""The scalability could be improved.""I don't have enough experience to understand the nuances of where they might improve.""The solution’s user reporting could be improved."

More Wasabi Cons →

Pricing and Cost Advice
  • "For one terabyte of data, we are spending about 150 Euro every month."
  • "One of the major benefits for AWS is that they have a very large customer representative base where clients can be picked from, they offer large discounts and credit. We were not able to receive the same kind of offers from Microsoft Azure File Storage. We tried to approach Azure while hiring for our disaster recovery discussion, but we didn't receive anything from Azure."
  • "The price is comparable to other competitive solutions."
  • "There are fewer hidden costs involved compared to other solutions, and when our customer is already a Microsoft partner, they typically have access to more affordable fees."
  • "Microsoft Azure File Storage has a reasonable price."
  • "I give the pricing of the solution a seven out of ten."
  • "One needs to pay according to the storage they plan to use in the solution. The payments are to be made yearly. It is usually monthly, but we opted for yearly subscriptions in our company."
  • "Microsoft Azure File Storage is expensive."
  • More Microsoft Azure File Storage Pricing and Cost Advice →

  • "I can only tell you that Wasabi costs about half what Amazon Web Services is charging. Now, the cost per month is a more difficult question. That varies depending on the capacity, the services you're employing, and that type of thing."
  • "Wasabi is a cost-effective solution for data storage, priced at just under six dollars per terabyte."
  • "The price of the solution is inexpensive."
  • "Wasabi has better pricing than Nutanix."
  • "Wasabi is a cheap solution, and users have to pay for a monthly license."
  • "The tool’s price is very reasonable."
  • "The price is reasonable."
  • More Wasabi Pricing and Cost Advice →

    report
    Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Public Cloud Storage Services solutions are best for your needs.
    772,649 professionals have used our research since 2012.
    Questions from the Community
    Top Answer:Amazon EFS is easy to set up: you can use the AWS management console, API, or command-line. Amazon EFS can grow to petabytes and deliver consistent low latencies and high levels of throughput. This… more »
    Top Answer:The price could be reduced. The tiered pricing model is good. The solution is a bit pricey compared to AWS and Google. We pay as we use.
    Top Answer:The tool is very user-friendly.
    Top Answer:We can reserve capacities based on our usage expectations for two to three years. We can pay for it annually. It is quite easy for the organization. The pricing model is quite affordable. The price is… more »
    Top Answer:The solution must allow the extension of the retention period. Depending on the use case, the retention period can hamper us. We understand the importance of the retention period when we compare it to… more »
    Ranking
    Views
    5,971
    Comparisons
    4,883
    Reviews
    31
    Average Words per Review
    400
    Rating
    8.2
    Views
    3,970
    Comparisons
    2,599
    Reviews
    5
    Average Words per Review
    412
    Rating
    7.4
    Comparisons
    Also Known As
    MS Azure File Storage
    Learn More
    Overview

    Fully managed file shares that use the standard SMB 3.0 protocol

    Key scenarios:

    • Share data across on-premises and cloud servers
    • Migrate file share-based applications to the cloud with no code changes
    • Integrate modern applications with File storage
    • Simplify hosting for high availability workload data

    Wasabi makes saving data simple, affordable, fast and secure. Wasabi Hot Cloud Storage removes the complicated decision of where, how and whether to save your data, and empowers you to transform your business and organization through cost savings and disruptive speed and performance.

    Sample Customers
    Talon, Camden
    FileShadow, Ivy League Schools, Russell Sage Colleges, Northeast Wisconsin Technical College, MayStreet
    Top Industries
    REVIEWERS
    Financial Services Firm19%
    Construction Company19%
    Manufacturing Company13%
    Computer Software Company13%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Computer Software Company17%
    Financial Services Firm10%
    Manufacturing Company8%
    Government7%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Computer Software Company14%
    Manufacturing Company11%
    Government8%
    Construction Company7%
    Company Size
    REVIEWERS
    Small Business41%
    Midsize Enterprise17%
    Large Enterprise41%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business23%
    Midsize Enterprise15%
    Large Enterprise62%
    REVIEWERS
    Small Business88%
    Large Enterprise13%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business34%
    Midsize Enterprise17%
    Large Enterprise49%
    Buyer's Guide
    Microsoft Azure File Storage vs. Wasabi
    May 2024
    Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft Azure File Storage vs. Wasabi and other solutions. Updated: May 2024.
    772,649 professionals have used our research since 2012.

    Microsoft Azure File Storage is ranked 3rd in Public Cloud Storage Services with 44 reviews while Wasabi is ranked 8th in Public Cloud Storage Services with 7 reviews. Microsoft Azure File Storage is rated 8.2, while Wasabi is rated 7.8. The top reviewer of Microsoft Azure File Storage writes "Various storage options available, high availability, and quick deployment". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Wasabi writes "An easy-to-use solution that can be used to move local backups to the cloud". Microsoft Azure File Storage is most compared with Amazon EFS (Elastic File System), Azure NetApp Files, Amazon S3 Glacier, Amazon S3 and Google Cloud Storage, whereas Wasabi is most compared with Amazon S3 Glacier, Google Cloud Storage, Amazon S3, Microsoft Azure Object Storage and NetApp Cloud Volumes ONTAP. See our Microsoft Azure File Storage vs. Wasabi report.

    See our list of best Public Cloud Storage Services vendors.

    We monitor all Public Cloud Storage Services reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.