We performed a comparison between Microsoft Azure Logic Apps and Mule Anypoint Platform based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Integration Platform as a Service (iPaaS) solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."If there's something that isn't possible, you can write some code and call that code from a Logic App."
"We mainly used it to integrate SAP, ServiceNow, and different third-party APIs with the front end."
"Logic Apps helped reduce complexity or development time. For example, if we get documents in the form of images, we can use Logic Apps to extract information from those images. This simplifies our efforts compared to originally using Microsoft APIs to do the same task."
"What I found most valuable in Microsoft Azure Logic Apps is that you can run a workflow or do a high-level process orchestration, then you can call the other function and fulfill the process. For example, if you want to update a customer, you first need to get the customer's phone number and simulate the steps of the process, then Microsoft Azure Logic Apps can orchestrate that process."
"The product’s most valuable feature is integration."
"Its integration capabilities are great, allowing connectivity with various applications and services."
"The product has efficient connectors."
"Logic Apps is valuable because my team uses it for integrating SaaS tool sets."
"This is a good platform for designing, flowing out APIs, and then doing API-based integrations."
"It is a stable product...The initial setup was simple."
"The exchange and API management features are the best in the market."
"It can scale."
"The initial setup is quite easy because the solution has a good interface through which the configuration, mapping, and so on can be done."
"When we talk about the APIs, there are multiple policies one can apply on APIs, like rate limiting policies, OWASP policies, and OWASP security policies, that can be easily configured in Mule Anypoint Platform."
"It is very easy to use for building connectors. It comes with a lot of connectors. For example, it has different adapters for NetSuite, which are very easy to use. It also has Salesforce connectors. The object store feature is also really easy to use. Mule Anypoint Platform is also good in terms of performance and how it is managed behind the scenes."
"The most valuable feature is the variety of characters Anypoint Platform has. It is very scalable and customizable."
"An area of improvement I've encountered is related to the number of connectors available in Logic Apps. While there are many connectors, I found that the "send email" connector may not work as expected, and one has to rely on Office 365 plugins or other alternatives. This could enhance user experience, especially when considering the additional overhead and licensing requirements associated with Office 365. It also needs to improve security features."
"There could be more AI features included in the product."
"The visual tool that is used to build integration is quite old."
"Microsoft Azure Logic Apps can improve by continually updating the connectors to make them better."
"It would be helpful if the vendor could provide more data connectors."
"Especially when using a function or a parameter, that could be easier as that's not very well-documented, and it's not very clear from the tool itself how to use it."
"The pricing could be improved."
"A room for improvement in Microsoft Azure Logic Apps is that it's expensive. Every step is going to cost you money, so if someone is not doing the steps carefully, at the end of the day, it will cost a lot of money. Each time you execute a step, the cost will depend on how much you use Microsoft Azure Logic Apps, and how many workflow steps you have. Each time a step needs to be executed, there'll be a cost added to your bill. If the developer isn't careful with how he uses the solution, this can blow up the cost. What I'd like to see in the next release of Microsoft Azure Logic Apps is for the cost and security to be better."
"The high price of the product is an area of concern where improvements are required."
"Price-wise, it is a good product since it is reasonably priced...Mule Anypoint Platform can get too complex for non-technical people."
"Better documentation, in particular with respect to the initial setup, would be helpful."
"It would be better if we had a clearer view of the solution's future releases."
"The terms of use and how it's priced has become very difficult to manage, which is forcing us to look for alternatives already - and we haven't even been using it for that long just yet."
"Although the solution's proxy design and process are good, it faces connecting issues because it lacks data integration."
"Mule should have better B2B integration."
"The stability could be better."
Microsoft Azure Logic Apps is ranked 2nd in Integration Platform as a Service (iPaaS) with 31 reviews while Mule Anypoint Platform is ranked 1st in Integration Platform as a Service (iPaaS) with 41 reviews. Microsoft Azure Logic Apps is rated 8.0, while Mule Anypoint Platform is rated 8.2. The top reviewer of Microsoft Azure Logic Apps writes "Has different connectors for workflow and comes with low-code feature". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Mule Anypoint Platform writes "Robust, reliable, and stable, ensuring high availability for critical integrations". Microsoft Azure Logic Apps is most compared with Boomi iPaaS, Oracle Integration Cloud Service, SAP Cloud Platform, Workato and webMethods.io Integration, whereas Mule Anypoint Platform is most compared with MuleSoft Composer, SAP Process Orchestration, Oracle Integration Cloud Service, SAP Cloud Platform and Azure Data Factory. See our Microsoft Azure Logic Apps vs. Mule Anypoint Platform report.
See our list of best Integration Platform as a Service (iPaaS) vendors.
We monitor all Integration Platform as a Service (iPaaS) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.