We performed a comparison between Microsoft Entra Verified ID and Okta Customer Identity based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Auth0, Ping Identity, Omada and others in Customer Identity and Access Management (CIAM)."I like the Microsoft Authenticator app since it comes with two-factor authentication."
"The most valuable feature of this solution for most customers is access management."
"Okta has more when it comes to the policy level. It has distinctive features where you can do a mix and combination to have users access applications for various business cases."
"I think all the functions of the solution are vital and important because life cycle management is important for some companies. The Single Sign-On feature is fantastic for different customers and advanced server access is really good for access to the servers."
"The end user's ease of use is the most valuable feature."
"The most valuable features of Okta Customer Identity are there is no infrastructure cost, integrated, has plenty of documentation, and is user-friendly."
"We can integrate two-factor authentication with the applications."
"We primarily use it to manage the community onboarding and offboarding of users, and it's quite a simple solution for that."
"The solution has great multifactor authentication."
"I must do two-factor authentication when I sign in from a different location. It creates friction. It's not personalized for the end user. I would like to see specific insights."
"The product must be provided for free."
"All of the governance functionality and privileged account management could be improved."
"Some limitations in scalability. Each application we work with can be completely different, resulting in highly variable implementation processes."
"Users sometimes have difficulty getting verification codes."
"Okta has a limitation with directory integrations. If you have multiple Active Directory integrations, the user distinguished name (DN) and the manager DN don't get imported properly into the Okta user profile."
"The initial setup could be easier to do."
"In the future, we'd like to see the product implement more security features, like, for example, zero-trust."
"What I'd like to see improved in Okta Customer Identity is the process of exporting users. Currently, it lacks this feature, and you have to use a third-party tool to export users from the group. Exporting users should be very easy, though I did notice that Okta Customer Identity is being upgraded from time to time, and I've been seeing much improvement in it compared to the previous years."
Microsoft Entra Verified ID is ranked 8th in Customer Identity and Access Management (CIAM) with 1 review while Okta Customer Identity is ranked 5th in Customer Identity and Access Management (CIAM) with 13 reviews. Microsoft Entra Verified ID is rated 6.0, while Okta Customer Identity is rated 8.4. The top reviewer of Microsoft Entra Verified ID writes "Offers single sign-on feature for business applications but needs to offer personalized insights ". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Okta Customer Identity writes "Ability to work with a wide range of applications and security mechanisms". Microsoft Entra Verified ID is most compared with Microsoft Defender for Identity, Microsoft Intune, Microsoft Entra ID, Auth0 and Microsoft Purview Data Governance, whereas Okta Customer Identity is most compared with ForgeRock, Microsoft Entra External ID, Auth0 and Frontegg.
See our list of best Customer Identity and Access Management (CIAM) vendors.
We monitor all Customer Identity and Access Management (CIAM) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.