We performed a comparison between Microsoft Office SharePoint Server and Oracle Beehive based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Content Collaboration Platforms solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."The most valuable feature is that it is very usable. I can navigate it, I can have a media call, I can have a call with my project team, so we can chat with every team kind of like WhatsApp. Any time there are projects or other things, we can chat in a secure way. It's automation-specific secure."
"This solution has provided us with a collaborative workspace to allow everyone to work together and be on the same page."
"It is a decent tool for collaboration, especially if you are already using other Office products."
"The solution's most valuable aspects are its collaboration capabilities, its communications site and the innovation within the product itself."
"It's a very robust product."
"The most valuable feature of this solution is the Communication Site."
"Document management and records management features are the most valuable."
"The collaboration, the ability for multiple users to work on a single document."
"This solution has automated protection from downtime. High-availability is built into every component, and the backups are completely automated."
"We have really high level of services, performance, availability, and it is stable. Everything works together really well."
"Sharepoint doesn't integrate well with Oracle, and we use a lot of Oracle products at our company. Therefore, it makes more sense for us to go to Oracle instead of continuing to use Sharepoint."
"I would like to see the integration with Teams reinforced."
"The product could be improved by accommodating different technologies, particularly integration."
"The GUI is outdated."
"The permission management features need improvement."
"This solution is not very stable. It is useful to arrange data but it's not the best for big data. Sometimes we have issues with our reports as a result."
"The product is behind in development and lacks some features."
"The solution needs to have more flexibility. The classic version had more flexibility, however, the modern version has many more limitations."
"The price of licenses is high and should be improved."
More Microsoft Office SharePoint Server Pricing and Cost Advice →
Microsoft Office SharePoint Server is ranked 11th in Content Collaboration Platforms while Oracle Beehive is ranked 27th in Content Collaboration Platforms. Microsoft Office SharePoint Server is rated 7.6, while Oracle Beehive is rated 9.6. The top reviewer of Microsoft Office SharePoint Server writes "Stable, integrates well with Teams, and has flexible and helpful support". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Oracle Beehive writes "Has an excellent Database Management System and high level of services, performance, and availability". Microsoft Office SharePoint Server is most compared with Amazon WorkDocs, Datto Workplace and FileCloud, whereas Oracle Beehive is most compared with . See our Microsoft Office SharePoint Server vs. Oracle Beehive report.
See our list of best Content Collaboration Platforms vendors.
We monitor all Content Collaboration Platforms reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
