We performed a comparison between MongoDB and Oracle NoSQL based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about MongoDB, Couchbase, InfluxData and others in NoSQL Databases."I like the document storage feature. It's pretty simple."
"It has visible benefits, actually, in terms of price of ownership if you compare it to, for example, Oracle."
"The installation is very easy to do and understand."
"Scalability seems good. I've never been even close to finding the limits. I've run a couple of notes of redundancy but I've never had any problems with scalability."
"It can handle a lot of files quickly."
"MongoDB is flexible and it allows other applications to be added."
"It is really a pretty easy product to use. It's very reliable, it's proven."
"We can define security rules at the database level or the cluster level to grant or deny access to particular users."
"The tool performs well."
"The product meets expectations when it comes to stability."
"The tool is easy to learn."
"NoSQL has high availability. I think it's perfect from a technical perspective. It's quick to run and go."
"We find it difficult to incorporate MongoDB in some projects."
"The performance can be improved."
"The on-premises version of the solution is still pretty expensive, especially compared to the cloud version."
"The analytics needs improvement."
"I suppose it could be a little more secure."
"We'd like technical support to respond faster to queries."
"It could be much more flexible like SequoiaDB. I would like to see more flexibility in the next release, especially when working with Microsoft Windows. A lot of people struggle with MongoDB because of their Windows versions. But Linux is faultless and mostly runs nicely."
"They could provide more documentation and examples for adding pipeline stages."
"The installation is difficult."
"Oracle could improve how NoSQL works in containers. I don't think NoSQL needs any new features, but I want to see new features in the Oracle Cloud Infrastructure. I would like to see some improvements in OCI's building options."
"Handling big data in a user-friendly way is currently a bit of an issue. The dashboard for this needs some work."
"The licensing model is bad."
MongoDB is ranked 1st in NoSQL Databases with 70 reviews while Oracle NoSQL is ranked 8th in NoSQL Databases with 7 reviews. MongoDB is rated 8.2, while Oracle NoSQL is rated 8.2. The top reviewer of MongoDB writes "Lightweight with good flexibility and very fast performance for searching data". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Oracle NoSQL writes "The implementation is simple and only takes 15 to 30 minutes". MongoDB is most compared with InfluxDB, Couchbase, ScyllaDB, Cassandra and Oracle Berkeley DB, whereas Oracle NoSQL is most compared with Cassandra, ScyllaDB, InfluxDB and Aerospike Database 7.
See our list of best NoSQL Databases vendors.
We monitor all NoSQL Databases reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.