We performed a comparison between Moodle and SAP SuccessFactors Learning based on our users’ reviews in five categories. After reading all of the collected data, you can find our conclusion below.
Features: SAP SuccessFactors Learning is notable for its comprehensive catalog, useful assignment profile feature, and seamless integration with other software solutions. Moodle provides flexibility, various customization options, and a supportive community for collaborative modifications and adaptations. Users of SAP SuccessFactors Learning want an updated interface, enhanced user management and integration, and a more flexible front end. Moodle could enhance its student interface, mobile access, insights, and reporting.
Service and Support: Some SAP SuccessFactors Learning customers have praised the efficient and knowledgeable assistance they've received, while others have faced challenges in communicating with the support team. Users praised Moodle support for its timely resolution of issues, but others find it insufficient, particularly without additional help from a Moodle-certified partner.
Ease of Deployment: Setting up SAP SuccessFactors Learning is more difficult and intricate compared to Moodle. The migration of learning items from an older system can be problematic and outdated. The initial setup for Moodle can be simple or complicated depending on the user's experience and the chosen deployment method. Moodle's deployment is generally considered to be straightforward, but some users may require the assistance of developers or professional services.
Pricing: Users consider the SAP SuccessFactors Learning's initial fee for implementation and ongoing support to be costly. Moodle provides various pricing plans, including a free open source version with additional charges for customization and support.
ROI: SAP SuccessFactors Learning's ROI depends on factors like organization size and implementation goals. Users suggest referring to user reviews or case studies specific to your industry. Moodle has proven valuable for organizations, as it saves time and money by reducing the need for extensive involvement in tests and quizzes. It is considered a worthwhile investment for training purposes.
Comparison Results: Our users prefer SAP SuccessFactors Learning over Moodle. It offers an intuitive interface, easy-to-use training, a strong catalog, and smooth integration with other solutions. It also improves resource allocation and access functions, making tasks easier to perform. On the other hand, Moodle is praised for its flexibility and customization options, but it lacks a user-friendly interface, requires extensive training, and has limited support options. Overall, SAP SuccessFactors Learning provides a more comprehensive and efficient learning management solution.
"It doesn't take long to learn how to use it and to set up basic courses and things like that."
"Cost-effective and intuitive."
"A really nice thing about Moodle is that it is very robust and flexible, and one of the big advantages of Moodle is that it is open source. It also has a lot of free documentation."
"The ability to insert a variety of tools, create and organize course content, and share large volumes of materials, written, audio, or visual, is very valuable."
"One of the most valuable aspects is the ability to input data into the model."
"The most valuable feature is the community. Moodle is a completely open source application and provides a lot of development knowledge. The other features we find valuable are the LTI tools, integrations and BigBlueButton."
"One of my biggest pet peeves is that many LMSs do not offer a course or site-level backup that is an industry-standard file. So, if you decide you don't like Moodle or some other LMS, you should be able to back up all your data and take it and go somewhere else. Moodle does offer that. There are several others that do that as well, but there are some LMSs that don't, which isn't a very good business practice because they hold their clients hostage. That's one of the things I really like about Moodle."
"Moodle integrates with many third party plugins, which has enabled us to make use of the latest technology. During the Covid 19 period, we used a plugin called BigBlueButton to facilitate online learning which was quick and easy to do."
"SAP SuccessFactors Learning is highly scalable."
"The most valuable features of the solution were the deployment and onboarding."
"Some valuable features include assigning various courses to employees based on their groups and roles, as well as providing specialized training for new hires."
"One valuable aspect of SAP SuccessFactors Learning is its stability and established customer base, particularly evident in modules like Employee Central."
"The platform's most valuable feature is personalized learning recommendations."
"Cloud Solution enables accessing the system from the internet, with no need to be within the company network."
"The best feature of SAP SuccessFactors Learning for me is the assignment profile. It's a rather specific feature, but this is what comes to mind."
"The most valuable feature for us in SAP SuccessFactors is the Performance Management module."
"The UI and interface of Moodle could be greatly improved. There has been some improvement in recent releases by Moodle but there is still a lot to be improved upon. It is challenging to get buy-in from different stakeholders when they see what it looks like."
"Sometimes, the gradebook can get broken if an incorrect formula is entered during creation."
"We have needed to complete many customizations for Moodle to use it in all of our relevant organizations. We have found many issues with the competencies as we cannot assign many sub competencies to competencies."
"Moodle's weakest point is the user interface."
"Its interface design could be more user-friendly."
"It would be a benefit if there was an easy single sign-on with social media services for Moodle. There are some plugins that I tried, but they didn't work seamlessly. it is a work in progress. Having the single sign-on with social media services would be appreciated because in my school we are using Google suite and the main reason why we use Google Classroom is that it is integrated seamlessly with the suite."
"The solution architecture could be improved."
"They need to have a better way to illustrate competencies so that, when people go through the programs, they can actually show they are competent in the subject matter."
"The product must make the integrations more seamless."
"The product's configuration process needs improvement."
"The product needs to improve its escalation system."
"One area I would like to improve in SAP SuccessFactors Learning is the overall user experience and product feedback loop."
"The technical support team has room for improvement."
"SAP SuccessFactors Learning doesn't have a punch-in and punch-out facility."
"The GUI and dashboards are areas in the solution with shortcomings where improvements are required."
"The solution should have a more user-friendly dashboard because its current dashboard is not so great."
Moodle is ranked 2nd in Learning Management Systems (LMS) with 26 reviews while SAP SuccessFactors Learning is ranked 4th in Learning Management Systems (LMS) with 24 reviews. Moodle is rated 8.0, while SAP SuccessFactors Learning is rated 7.8. The top reviewer of Moodle writes "Inexpensive and pretty easy to use, but not easily adaptable for an individual". On the other hand, the top reviewer of SAP SuccessFactors Learning writes "An easy-to-deploy and stable solution helpful for multiple HR-related activities". Moodle is most compared with Google Classroom, CYPHER Learning, Chamilo LMS, LearnWorlds and TalentLMS, whereas SAP SuccessFactors Learning is most compared with Workday, Litmos, Cornerstone Learning, INX +LMS and Wombat Security Education Platform. See our Moodle vs. SAP SuccessFactors Learning report.
See our list of best Learning Management Systems (LMS) vendors.
We monitor all Learning Management Systems (LMS) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.