We compared Ubuntu Linux and openSUSE Leap based on our user's reviews in several parameters.
Ubuntu Linux and openSUSE Leap both receive positive user feedback, with Ubuntu praised for its user-friendly interface, extensive software repositories, and security features, while openSUSE Leap is commended for its stability, reliability, and strong community support. Differences lie in Ubuntu's affordability and ease of customization, compared to openSUSE Leap's advanced features like the Btrfs file system and Snapper tool. Users suggest Ubuntu improves performance, system optimization, user interface, and compatibility, while openSUSE Leap could enhance package management, interface, stability, boot times, hardware compatibility, and documentation.
Features: Ubuntu Linux is acclaimed for its user-friendly interface, extensive software repositories, regular updates, and excellent community support. In contrast, openSUSE Leap stands out for its stability, reliability, YaST package manager for easy software installation, and advanced features like the Btrfs file system and Snapper tool for system snapshots.
Pricing and ROI: In terms of setup cost, Ubuntu Linux and openSUSE Leap both offer reasonable pricing structures. Users have found the setup process for Ubuntu Linux to be user-friendly and straightforward. The licensing for both products is flexible and accommodating for various usage requirements., Ubuntu Linux has a positive return on investment due to its affordability, compatibility with software and hardware, and improved efficiency. openSUSE Leap offers stability, ease of use, and cost-effectiveness, with comprehensive documentation and efficient troubleshooting support.
Room for Improvement: Ubuntu Linux could improve performance, system optimization, user interface, compatibility with hardware and software, and regular updates. On the other hand, openSUSE Leap could enhance package management, user interface, stability, boot times, hardware compatibility, and documentation.
Deployment and customer support: The user reviews for Ubuntu Linux and openSUSE Leap indicate that the time required for establishing a new tech solution varies significantly. Some users mentioned spending three months on deployment and an additional week on setup, while others only required a week for both deployment and setup., Users have expressed satisfaction with the customer service and support provided by Ubuntu Linux, commending the team for their prompt, reliable, and professional assistance. On the other hand, openSUSE Leap customers appreciate the team's responsiveness, helpfulness, and efficient assistance in resolving issues.
The summary above is based on 28 interviews we conducted recently with Ubuntu Linux and openSUSE Leap users. To access the review's full transcripts, download our report.
"The solution is very stable after it is configured. It is hard to have a panel slow, a problem, misconfiguration, or any kind of loss function."
"The solution is easy for me to use because the backend is derived from FreeBSD and this is something I have been using for over 20 years."
"I use openSUSE Leap as the base for the Kubernetes cluster we run in-house."
"openSUSE Leap has helped me with using containers in Podman."
"Stable - it just runs without the necessity to reboot."
"The most valuable feature by far has been the virtualization capabilities of the operating system."
"Ubuntu is good for machine learning. It's also a good option for any type of application, like multimedia and movies."
"The solution has high fantastic performance."
"There is a lot of freedom and flexibility to install it really quickly. It is just very powerful in the sense that it doesn't take up as many resources to run as some of the other operating systems. It is open source, so it is free. There is no licensing fee. There is flexibility and freedom to do whatever you need to do. If you are familiar with the command line, you can jump on the command line and configure almost any part of the operating system that you want. If you are not comfortable with the command line, the graphical user interface has really improved ever since I started using Linux back in high school. It is really very simple to manage your settings and other things. You can also try out multiple desktop environments. As a matter of fact, on one of my laptops, I have installed five different desktop environments, and I can switch between them. If you don't like one, you can easily just install another one with a few commands, and you have got a whole new desktop right there, whereas, in Microsoft Windows or a Mac, you are just stuck with whatever they give you, and you have to wait until they sell you something else."
"It is stable and quite easy to use as compared to other Linux operating systems. They have created a system like Windows. It is simple and without any problems."
"You can scale the solution quite well."
"We can easily customize the NTS Client code."
"The most valuable features are the pseudo-terminal and it is the most open-sourced operating system that can be used."
"The security is very good."
"In the future, the Active Directory could improve."
"There is room for improvement in the console."
"Somehow the change from OS12.x via 13.x to Leap was a bit bumpy and some old issues seemed to reappear."
"Like most Linux-based operating systems, the biggest challenge Leap faces is the GUI."
"The initial system setup or network configuration of the solution is not straightforward and can be improved."
"I would like openSUSE Leap to have better link integration with Windows."
"In general, Windows is easier to use and friendlier to deal with than Ubuntu."
"The solution could improve its GUI personalization."
"There is not a lot of support for applications in Ubuntu Linux. In the industry, most of the applications work for Windows and Mac. There should be better integration with applications in the future."
"The solution could improve by being more user-friendly."
"The solution could be more user-friendly, as I use Mac on a day to day basis."
"It should be easier and lighter. I am more experienced in working with CentOS, and I find CentOS much easier to use than Ubuntu. Ubuntu is more complicated than CentOS. Ubuntu is also heavier for hardware than centOS."
"When you upgrade the core of this operating system, it can crash. This is the only problem I had. It needs more stable upgrades."
"Ubuntu might work for a bigger company, but I don't think so. Again, you would have to get the right people to do it. You need somebody technical. If you have a bunch of people who aren't technical, then it is just going to be a headache trying to get a feel for it or teach them."
openSUSE Leap is ranked 12th in Operating Systems (OS) for Business with 6 reviews while Ubuntu Linux is ranked 2nd in Operating Systems (OS) for Business with 133 reviews. openSUSE Leap is rated 9.0, while Ubuntu Linux is rated 8.6. The top reviewer of openSUSE Leap writes "Good virtualization capabilities, stable, and cost-effective ". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Ubuntu Linux writes "A stable and free solution that is easy to deploy and has a user-friendly GUI". openSUSE Leap is most compared with SUSE Linux Enterprise, Rocky Linux, CentOS, Red Hat Enterprise Linux (RHEL) and Oracle Linux, whereas Ubuntu Linux is most compared with Rocky Linux, Oracle Linux, SUSE Linux Enterprise, Windows Server and Oracle Solaris. See our Ubuntu Linux vs. openSUSE Leap report.
See our list of best Operating Systems (OS) for Business vendors.
We monitor all Operating Systems (OS) for Business reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.