We performed a comparison between Oracle Fusion Middleware and Oracle WebLogic Server based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Application Server solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."The most valuable features are Oracle Unified Directory and unified identity access management."
"Data integrity."
"One good thing, which is a little bit common across all middleware products, is that you can build asynchronous as well as synchronous processes. The SOA part is where it can maintain your state for any state-full integrations. If you have failures, you can replay all that, which is a good part."
"Oracle Service Bus is the most valuable feature of the solution."
"It is really good in terms of features, and it is stable."
"Fusion Middleware's main feature for me is that it is quite flexible, and, as middleware, it provides us with all sorts of technology and application adapters, which makes it very handy to use."
"The initial setup is easy. There are many self-tutorial videos are on the Internet, and then the Oracle documents are self-explanatory."
"The most valuable feature is the structure of the product. We use Oracle Fusion Middleware to manage the Oracle database. Registered users can go to each product if sign-on credentials match each user's identical framework."
"The product is flexible and allows us to leverage deployments."
"It is quite robust in comparison to other application servers."
"Another valuable feature is the ability to automate tasks through scripts, making our environment highly efficient."
"Oracle WebLogic Server has a bunch of ready features that are easy to use and understand."
"It's a very stable solution."
"The solution works well in load balancing."
"The technical support is responsive. They are always ready to help by various communication channels, such as Zoom calls. However, sometimes it will take a while because when we are dealing with a problem, they need to look at the logs and configuration. A lot of the issues are related to the configuration that they need to look at thoroughly before they can give us a solution and it can take a few days depending on the type of problem."
"One of the good features of Oracle WebLogic Server was the ability to add some custom parameters to its deployment and performance."
"The price could always be better."
"I would rate the stability a nine out of ten because we did have multiple breakdowns and crashes."
"Technical support should resolve issues more quickly."
"Oracle Fusion Middleware could improve by offering enhanced and customizable business-related features, particularly in supporting individual businesses or custom applications."
"All areas of HCM modules could use some improvement."
"An improvement for Oracle's Fusion Middleware could definitely be found in the SOA component. It's a heavyweight container and, if you ask me, if a product is available as a docker image where we can easily port it in to another Kubernetes platform, that would be perfect. But as for the current situation in the market, nobody is really willing to deploy this on premises."
"Oracle Fusion Middleware is based on the regulations in Saudi Arabia and the legislation changes. There is a need to be improvements all the time. It needs to adapt quickly in this market. Additionally, there could be some improvements in the construction sector."
"The documentation might not be good enough for new users."
"The error handling area in Oracle WebLogic Server is an area of concern where improvements are required."
"There's a bug related to the managed services."
"The tool's implementation should be easier. The product is also expensive."
"The solution is very expensive, and its pricing could be improved."
"Pricing for Oracle WebLogic Server and other Oracle products has room for improvement because the pricing model isn't easy to understand. I'd like to see lower pricing from Oracle WebLogic Server. That's the main issue with the solution."
"The integration could be improved."
"The logs consultant, since it tends to be more in the server, we do need complete consult logs for a lot of different files."
"There are always ways to improve. But it's getting better every time, with every new release, and every new patch, it's getting better."
Oracle Fusion Middleware is ranked 6th in Application Server with 12 reviews while Oracle WebLogic Server is ranked 1st in Application Server with 33 reviews. Oracle Fusion Middleware is rated 8.0, while Oracle WebLogic Server is rated 8.0. The top reviewer of Oracle Fusion Middleware writes "Maintains top database performance and includes a very good ATB feature". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Oracle WebLogic Server writes "Offers efficient load distribution with a scope of high scalability ". Oracle Fusion Middleware is most compared with Tomcat, IBM WebSphere Application Server, IIS, JBoss and TIBCO ActiveMatrix, whereas Oracle WebLogic Server is most compared with Tomcat, JBoss, Oracle Application Server, IBM WebSphere Application Server and IIS. See our Oracle Fusion Middleware vs. Oracle WebLogic Server report.
See our list of best Application Server vendors.
We monitor all Application Server reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.