We performed a comparison between Ping Identity Platform and RSA SecurID based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Authentication Systems solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."I like the self-service feature. The 502 and UBP systems are also excellent. PingID's ability to authenticate with SSH, RDP, and Windows login is pretty handy. It covers the entire spectrum of use."
"This is a user-friendly solution."
"It's pretty stable as a product."
"It is a scalable solution...It is a stable solution."
"The solution is highly stable and scalable"
"The most valuable feature is multifactor authentication."
"What I like best about PingID is that it's very user-friendly. PingID is well-built as a developer tool and regularly upgrades and updates via patches. I also like that PingID has clear documents that will help you integrate it with other solutions."
"The solution has a smooth and configurable user interface for single sign-on capabilities."
"I would say that the two-factor authentication and the ease of installation and configuration are the most valuable features of this solution."
"It is a scalable solution."
"I think it is really good when it comes to the hard token side of things."
"The most valuable features of RSA SecurID Access are push notifications, multifactor authentication, and ease of integration and deployment."
"One of the most valuable feature is the ID soft token and hard token."
"I think that the connection with like Microsoft Word, especially for Office 365, is a weak point that could be improved."
"We have encountered instances where it is not easy to do authentication."
"The management console needs to be improved. PingID should revise it."
"The product is not customizable."
"The solution should allow for better integration with other platforms and the UBT."
"PingID should put a little more effort into making a pretty self-explanatory deck about their tech features and the services they offer."
"They could use some bio-certification. It's just more user-friendly and more convenient than entering the one time passes. That would be an improvement."
"The initial setup appears to be difficult in the beginning."
"There are different compliances across the globe; RSA SecurID Access could be more complaint-based."
"Sometimes, we encounter issues with other applications that are not compatible with RSA SecurID Access and require expert troubleshooting. At those times, we need additional support from an implementation perspective. This is an area where Oracle can improve as there is no substitute for reliable and efficient support."
"It doesn't offer an agent-based or reverse-proxy-based approach to integration, which could enhance its flexibility."
"The interface needs to improve a lot. It should be easier to manage and navigate."
Ping Identity Platform is ranked 5th in Authentication Systems with 19 reviews while RSA SecurID is ranked 8th in Authentication Systems with 9 reviews. Ping Identity Platform is rated 8.4, while RSA SecurID is rated 7.8. The top reviewer of Ping Identity Platform writes " A highly stable tool offering extremely helpful technical support to its users". On the other hand, the top reviewer of RSA SecurID writes "Useful for making logins more secure by using multifactor authentication but extremely expensive". Ping Identity Platform is most compared with Microsoft Entra ID, Symantec Siteminder, ForgeRock, Microsoft Active Directory and Auth0, whereas RSA SecurID is most compared with Yubico YubiKey, Microsoft Entra ID, Fortinet FortiToken, Cisco ISE (Identity Services Engine) and Fortinet FortiAuthenticator. See our Ping Identity Platform vs. RSA SecurID report.
See our list of best Authentication Systems vendors.
We monitor all Authentication Systems reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.