We performed a comparison between Qualitia Automation Studio and Tricentis Tosca based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Tricentis, OpenText, Katalon Studio and others in Test Automation Tools."The best feature of this solution is the fact that it offers scriptless automation. You don't need to know how to code or program to use it."
"It can provide all levels of testing from design to execution to reporting."
"One notable feature is its ability to handle negative XPath healing processes. If one XPath fails, Tosca can utilize backup XPaths to ensure test cases do not fail due to locator issues, thereby focusing on identifying application-side issues, which is the ultimate goal."
"We have multiple applications, and it supports parallel execution. It has mobile automation."
"I am impressed with the product's script test."
"Software testing tool that has multiple features. It's good to use for SAP testing, and it helps reduce test execution time."
"The technical support is good, we were satisfied."
"It's integrated with different technologies, desktop applications, package solutions like SAP, and mobile applications."
"As a codeless automation tool, the product offers a user-friendly experience without requiring extensive coding knowledge. Users can easily handle various applications, including web applications, SAP applications, Windows applications, and even Salesforce applications, without manual coding."
"The integrations for this solutions could be improved, specifically for Slack."
"The document object model or some aspects of it has a bit of a learning curve."
"I would like to see more implementation of AI on the self-healing aspect. That would be like the next step."
"The user management could improve in Tricentis Tosca because it is confusing. It would be better to have it in one place. Having to add it to the cloud and to a specific project can be a mess."
"One thing to improve in Tricentis Tosca is that it's not compatible with Excel based forms. Another area for improvement is that the tool is not compatible with OpenText applications. The support and licensing cost for it also need improvement. The tool also needs cloud support, as it's currently on-premises only."
"Tricentis Tosca could improve on its mobile automation solution."
"First, Tricentis could improve Tosca's Linux scripting. We can automate Linux scripting, but there are a few commands that Tosca doesn't support. DVS support and the object identification mechanism could also be better."
"The solution needs to improve its simulation of mobile environments. Right now, that aspect is really lacking."
"Not being able to mask test data in relation to testing data management, in my opinion, is also a limitation."
Qualitia Automation Studio is ranked 23rd in Test Automation Tools with 5 reviews while Tricentis Tosca is ranked 1st in Test Automation Tools with 98 reviews. Qualitia Automation Studio is rated 8.0, while Tricentis Tosca is rated 8.2. The top reviewer of Qualitia Automation Studio writes "Good Tool for Non Technical Users". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Tricentis Tosca writes "Does not require coding experience to use and comes with productivity and time-saving features ". Qualitia Automation Studio is most compared with OpenText UFT One and Selenium HQ, whereas Tricentis Tosca is most compared with Katalon Studio, OpenText UFT One, Worksoft Certify, Postman and Testim.
See our list of best Test Automation Tools vendors and best Regression Testing Tools vendors.
We monitor all Test Automation Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
