We performed a comparison between Rapid7 InsightVM and Skybox Security Suite based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Risk-Based Vulnerability Management solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."It's a relevant management tool."
"We can create our own templates."
"This solution is very easy to use and easy to install."
"The risk score that they provide makes it easier to find out the biggest risks. It helped the security officers to understand where the biggest risks are so that they can act on them. They can instruct their IT teams to give them a higher priority and mitigate them."
"The solution scales well."
"It's very scalable."
"The remediation project is a pretty effective because it allows us, as clients or countries, to choose specific assets and set limitations on them for a certain period which allows us to track and follow up on those limitations. However, when it comes to real-time monitoring and live dashboards, InsightVM doesn't quite fit the bill. It's not a real-time solution and is not instant."
"There are many integrations with things like the VMware NSX that are great, the reporting is really solid."
"It has a good policy management feature and can provide customers with good quality outputs."
"I think that compliance checks and policy compliance are the product's good features."
"Overall, the tool has helped us reduce risks. If any step is missing, it's easier for my team or engineers to identify it. The tool provides accurate recommendations based on the data. Its integration is easy, and I have integrated it with Fortinet firewalls."
"This type of tool does a great job of reaching into those other devices producing risk recommendations, compliance recommendations, and a single plane of glass to do your queries, so you can find where these rules might exist."
"Key features for us include the firewall change audit every week. Also, being able to track firewall ACL usage, so that we can produce semiannual reports on ACL usage and shadowed and redundant rules on the firewall."
"The port division management was the solution's most valuable aspect for our organization."
"It's given us more visibility in terms of what are the kinds of configurations that are on these devices, and how many of these are stale rules. So it's helped greatly in terms of cleaning up of rules, for sure. And it has definitely given us a more secure way of backing up the configuration on these devices."
"The most valuable feature is the compliance, whether it's access compliance or the configuration compliance, to make sure that all of our devices are configured as they're supposed to be, to limit access as much possible, to follow least-access guidelines."
"There is room for improvement on its cloud side. In the next release I would like to see better reporting."
"There needs to be much clearer instructions surrounding scanning."
"The reporting could be better."
"The solution should include a tighter integration with third-party threat modeling and threat intelligence tools."
"Some difficulties with the online reporting and lack of integrations."
"This solution integrates with another module in Metasploit, that doesn't exist in the other solutions. It is subscribed to on our roadmap, but we chose to implement both Nexppose and AppSpider."
"Rapid7 InsightVM could be easier to use for those who are using it for the first time."
"The solution needs to improve its vulnerability design to include CVC results."
"There is room for improvement in the technical support."
"The solution does not support certain devices or vendors in some regions or countries due to regulations."
"The price is costly, and I hope they can reduce the cost."
"The solution needs to move improve its interface to a full web browser version that is more accessible and doesn't require installation for use."
"There are multiple dashboards but no custom dashboard. It would be good to include a custom dashboard so that we can actually choose which field and what kinds of things we want to look at."
"During implementation, we realised approximately 30 devices were not supported by the Skybox platform."
"They are not satisfied with the complexity of the solution and the price."
"The solution needs to add more automation and orchestration capabilities. Those features would make the solution much stronger."
Rapid7 InsightVM is ranked 4th in Risk-Based Vulnerability Management with 55 reviews while Skybox Security Suite is ranked 19th in Vulnerability Management with 34 reviews. Rapid7 InsightVM is rated 8.0, while Skybox Security Suite is rated 7.8. The top reviewer of Rapid7 InsightVM writes "You can scan a network, and receive recommendations to address vulnerabilities with the click of a button". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Skybox Security Suite writes "Efficient in vulnerability management, stable and easy to use ". Rapid7 InsightVM is most compared with Tenable Nessus, Qualys VMDR, Tenable Security Center, Microsoft Defender Vulnerability Management and Wiz, whereas Skybox Security Suite is most compared with AlgoSec, Tufin Orchestration Suite, FireMon Security Manager, Palo Alto Networks Panorama and Tenable Nessus. See our Rapid7 InsightVM vs. Skybox Security Suite report.
We monitor all Risk-Based Vulnerability Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.