We performed a comparison between Rapid7 InsightVM and Splunk Enterprise Security based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Tenable, Qualys, Rapid7 and others in Risk-Based Vulnerability Management."One of the most valuable features is it's graphical dashboard feature. It is quite easy to manage the widgets, and we can customize those according to our queries."
"The solution works well."
"When it comes to the process, installation is very easy and does not take long."
"It's very scalable."
"The product's initial setup phase was very easy."
"The remediation project is a pretty effective because it allows us, as clients or countries, to choose specific assets and set limitations on them for a certain period which allows us to track and follow up on those limitations. However, when it comes to real-time monitoring and live dashboards, InsightVM doesn't quite fit the bill. It's not a real-time solution and is not instant."
"The discovery and prioritization of vulnerabilities."
"You can bring in and get online to do reports fairly quickly,"
"Integrity with many vendors: This simplifies the implementation and integration with different devices"
"It helps us uncover bottlenecks in the network."
"The initial setup is pretty straightforward."
"Splunk allows us to customize processing and dashboards, which helps us take care of our customers' needs."
"The ability to ingest any data and display it in a way that anyone can understand."
"The dashboard and reporting are very good... It provides very good visibility in a hybrid cloud environment, and you can build custom utilization APIs using Splunk."
"The most valuable feature of Splunk Enterprise Security is website activity monitoring."
"The search lookups are useful."
"The on-premise updates could improve from Rapid7 InsightVM."
"There are end-user needs and expectations that are being overlooked in the development that could be addressed by appointing a customer advisory board."
"InsightVM could be improved by providing passive scanning as an option."
"The solution needs to improve its vulnerability design to include CVC results."
"Some difficulties with the online reporting and lack of integrations."
"There is room for improvement on its cloud side. In the next release I would like to see better reporting."
"They should improve the cybersecurity feature of the solution."
"InsightVM is getting a little stale and is in danger of falling behind its competitors."
"The security can be improved."
"It's difficult to set up initially, and their billing model is also a bit complicated."
"Splunk Enterprise Security incurs a significant cost because of the amount of data we send, but we are fine with the value we're getting for that price."
"The integration with all our tool sets felt like we were reinventing the wheel, which was a pain point for us."
"The prices are complicated as we operate in a small third-world country."
"It would be good if the solution had some kind of copilot to automate or help write correlation searches."
"While scheduled reports can be embedded, Splunk dashboard can not be embedded directly without enabling cross origin."
"Licensing costs can be a barrier for those with limited budgets."
Rapid7 InsightVM is ranked 4th in Risk-Based Vulnerability Management with 55 reviews while Splunk Enterprise Security is ranked 1st in Security Information and Event Management (SIEM) with 246 reviews. Rapid7 InsightVM is rated 8.0, while Splunk Enterprise Security is rated 8.4. The top reviewer of Rapid7 InsightVM writes "You can scan a network, and receive recommendations to address vulnerabilities with the click of a button". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Splunk Enterprise Security writes "It has a drag-and-drop interface, so you don't need to know SQL or Java to construct a query ". Rapid7 InsightVM is most compared with Tenable Nessus, Qualys VMDR, Tenable Security Center, Microsoft Defender Vulnerability Management and Wiz, whereas Splunk Enterprise Security is most compared with Wazuh, IBM Security QRadar, Dynatrace, Elastic Security and Microsoft Sentinel.
We monitor all Risk-Based Vulnerability Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.