We performed a comparison between Rapid7 InsightVM and Tableau based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Tenable, Qualys, Rapid7 and others in Risk-Based Vulnerability Management."NeXpose is a pretty good vulnerability scanner... There's a nice dashboard."
"The reports in Rapid7 InsightVM are useful when compared to competitors."
"The discovery and prioritization of vulnerabilities."
"The remediation project is a pretty effective because it allows us, as clients or countries, to choose specific assets and set limitations on them for a certain period which allows us to track and follow up on those limitations. However, when it comes to real-time monitoring and live dashboards, InsightVM doesn't quite fit the bill. It's not a real-time solution and is not instant."
"InsightVM offers a robust platform for identifying, prioritizing, and addressing vulnerabilities across an organization's IT infrastructure."
"You can bring in and get online to do reports fairly quickly,"
"InsightVM's most valuable feature is risk scoring, a formula based on different vectors like the ease of exploitation and the availability of the machine."
"This solution is very easy to use and easy to install."
"Good data flow and management."
"The solution is being delivered to our customer, who appreciates the insights generated from the reports. It is easy for them to drill into the details and use interactive charts."
"Its visualizations are good, and its features make the development process a little less time-consuming. It has an in-memory extract feature that allows us to extract data and keep it on the server, and then our users can use it quickly."
"There is a lot of APIs available, which means that Tableau can be customized to a large extent."
"When compared to Power BI, Tableau has more readily available resources."
"It most valuable feature is its ease of developing visualizations, not just charts and graphs."
"The solution is configurable and flexible. We can customize the dashboards and configure the interface the way that we want. The data can be manipulated and arranged in different ways, such as columns."
"The ability to deploy is the added ability to centralise the Tableau repository for all Tableau Developers."
"There should be containerization within the VM."
"They should improve the cybersecurity feature of the solution."
"There is room for improvement on its cloud side. In the next release I would like to see better reporting."
"It would be nice to have an additional feature that would provide reports on who has logged onto the console or who did what on the console."
"I would say that it improved our visibility, but it left things open."
"It is still not a fully cloud-based solution. It will be helpful for customers if it is a complete cloud solution. It is a hybrid solution at the moment."
"The solution needs to improve its vulnerability design to include CVC results."
"The reporting has room for improvement. You cannot customize any report. If I need a specific requirement, I have to create a new report for it."
"I would like to be able to set the parameters in a more specific manner."
"There could be improvements on the mobile application, it is lacking features."
"The solution could use more features in data analytics."
"We did have issues with Tableau 10.1 server with the brokers failing on heavy load but since moving to 10.2, then to 10.3, this issue seems to have been resolved and the environment is now quite stable."
"Many things have to be improved in Tableau. Right now, we make the calculation, and then we get that information. It would be better if business users could do that. I would ask the people at Tableau to provide that option to business users to get that information in one click. It would be better if they automated some calculations. There should be more automation in Tableau. However, there are many things in automation mode, but it is very limited at the moment. We need automation for people who do not know much about Tableau. It would also be better if there were good community support like in Alteryx."
"From a downside perspective, some of the more advanced modeling techniques are actually fairly difficult to do. In addition, I just fundamentally disagree with the way you have to implement them because you can get incorrect answers in some cases."
"With Tableau, there is a gap in its ability to handle very large-scale data."
"Other tools are more competitively priced."
Rapid7 InsightVM is ranked 4th in Risk-Based Vulnerability Management with 55 reviews while Tableau is ranked 2nd in BI (Business Intelligence) Tools with 293 reviews. Rapid7 InsightVM is rated 8.0, while Tableau is rated 8.4. The top reviewer of Rapid7 InsightVM writes "You can scan a network, and receive recommendations to address vulnerabilities with the click of a button". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Tableau writes "Provides fast data access with in-memory extracts, makes it easy to create visualizations, and saves time". Rapid7 InsightVM is most compared with Tenable Nessus, Qualys VMDR, Tenable Security Center, Microsoft Defender Vulnerability Management and Wiz, whereas Tableau is most compared with Microsoft Power BI, Amazon QuickSight, Domo, SAS Visual Analytics and Databricks.
We monitor all Risk-Based Vulnerability Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.