We performed a comparison between RSA enVision and Trellix ESM based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Security Information and Event Management (SIEM) solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."The configuration part is very easy...The technical support was sincere in their responses...I rate the technical support a nine out of ten."
"The most valuable feature is the management features. It's capable of managing large enterprises."
"The most valuable feature of this solution is the reporting."
"We are now able to completely monitor our environment so we can review what is there, which is a big win for us."
"This solution integrates easily and very well with other technologies."
"The ease of use is the most valuable feature. Over the years I have always been using this solution and have become comfortable with it."
"I rate the tool's deployment an eight out of ten. The deployment is completed in two days."
"It has performed well and delivered the results that I have been looking for."
"The product’s most valuable feature is log monitoring."
"It enables us to detect malicious threats, issues, or vulnerabilities in our network."
"It can be easily deployed with the other solutions."
"The integration could be easier, it should support more products."
"In general, the solution currently isn't user-friendly."
"RSA enVision log manager is out of date and is not in use anymore."
"The only drawback is that they don't have any packet capturing or network behavior analysis."
"McAfee ESM is not user-friendly and the log is not accurate. For instance, if I were assigned to generate a log for changes made today, I wouldn't be able to see all the modifications. While Palo Alto allows us to see all changes, McAfee ESM only captures one out of every ten changes. It's crucial to have visibility into all changes made."
"There are some banking and transactional cases that are local, South America transactions. I would like to see them add features that can be used locally, to make those transactions more reliable."
"Product currently requires Flash."
"I would like to see good analytics in future releases."
"We acquired the IBM product because McAfee is slightly confusing to use, and it's broader."
"Customized reports and alerting functionality could be included in the dashboard."
"I have to purchase a new box now. Its existing box is not scalable and I can't use it anymore."
RSA enVision is ranked 35th in Security Information and Event Management (SIEM) with 5 reviews while Trellix ESM is ranked 18th in Security Information and Event Management (SIEM) with 34 reviews. RSA enVision is rated 6.8, while Trellix ESM is rated 7.4. The top reviewer of RSA enVision writes "Though the solution offers good technical support, it needs to be made more user-friendly ". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Trellix ESM writes "Provides visibility of all the traffic within the company infrastructure". RSA enVision is most compared with NetWitness Platform, Splunk Enterprise Security, IBM Security QRadar and Microsoft Sentinel, whereas Trellix ESM is most compared with ArcSight Enterprise Security Manager (ESM), IBM Security QRadar, Splunk Enterprise Security, LogRhythm SIEM and Trellix Helix. See our RSA enVision vs. Trellix ESM report.
See our list of best Security Information and Event Management (SIEM) vendors.
We monitor all Security Information and Event Management (SIEM) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.