We performed a comparison between Sauce Labs and SonarQube based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Tricentis, OpenText, Perforce and others in Functional Testing Tools."The insights section provides a great overall state of the automation suite and can identify trends relatively quickly. If we see a dip in our passing rate over time, we can look at what changed when the test started failing to find the root cause rather than doing a quick fix to find that the test fails a short time later."
"The error logging is also very robust. If we run a test through Sauce Labs and there's some sort of issue, a log will appear on the screen. Log messages are usually heinous and horrible... Sauce Labs is incredibly good at saying things like, 'Hey, here is the exact issue. Fix this and you can run the test.' That helps in getting things up and running and executing the way they should."
"The most valuable feature is cross-browser, cross-OS, cross-mobile device testing."
"It runs on the cloud, so you don't have physical setups to run all of this."
"The custom capabilities that can be provided to Sauce Labs VMs during automated testing sessions are a valuable option for experimental or niche testing."
"It offers the single best solution for integrating deep automated browser testing in a CI/CD pipeline."
"With only a few clicks, it gives us the availability to use any browser and OS combination whenever we want."
"Testing across multiple devices and environments is now possible to do quickly and effectively."
"Code Convention: Using the tool to implement some sort of coding convention is really useful and ensures that the code is consistent no matter how many contributors."
"All the features of the solution are quite good."
"The most valuable features are the wide array of languages, multiple languages per project, the breakdown of bugs, and the description of vulnerabilities and code smells (best practices)."
"I like that it has a better dashboard compared to Clockwork. It's also stable."
"The most valuable features are the dashboard reports and the ease of integrating it with Jenkins."
"It assists during the development with SonarLint and helps the developer to change his approach or rather improve his coding pattern or style. That's one advantage I've seen. Another advantage is that we can customize the rules."
"The most valuable features are the analysis and detection of issues within the application code."
"We advise all of our developers to have this solution in place."
"The only drawback is the speed, it will be good if we have a server in Asia too. It will be great if we can improve speed while initialization and execution."
"We encountered minor issues with stability from time to time but Sauce Labs continues to make improvements."
"User account management needs an overhauls, allowing for user groups rather than just a hierarchy structure."
"We have had some issues with the Sauce Connect Proxy on our Jenkins servers failing to start, which makes the optimal CI/CD pipeline come to a halt."
"I would like for there to be more detail in regards to the quality of our code i.e. how many failures occurred, how many passed based on industry standard metrics, etc."
"I can't remove team members that have left the organization. I can only set them as inactive. It would be really nice to clean up my data and delete them from the team management."
"Unable to segregate reports for tests that are currently being developed, and might not be returning useful results."
"I would like to see improved network connectivity and it should allow playback for native apps."
"This solution finds issues that are similar to what is found by Checkmarx, and it would be nice if the overlap could be eliminated."
"We found a solution with dynamic testing, and are looking to find a solution that can be used for both types of testing."
"We could use some team support, but since we are using the community version, it's not available."
"It should be user-friendly."
"A robust credential scanner would be a huge bonus as it would remove the need for yet another niche product."
"I would like to see SonarQube implement a good amount of improvements to the product's security features. Another aspect of SonarQube that could be improved is the search functionality."
"The scanning part could be improved in SonarQube. We have used Coverity for scanning, and we have the critical issues reported by Coverity. When we used SonarQube for scanning and looked at the results, it seems that some of them have incorrect input. This part can be improved for C and C++ languages."
"I would like to see improvements in defining the quality sets of rules and the quality to ensure code with low-performance does not end up in production."
Sauce Labs is ranked 11th in Functional Testing Tools with 113 reviews while SonarQube is ranked 1st in Application Security Tools with 112 reviews. Sauce Labs is rated 8.8, while SonarQube is rated 8.0. The top reviewer of Sauce Labs writes "Robust documentation, helpful support representative, good licensing model". On the other hand, the top reviewer of SonarQube writes "Easy to integrate and has a plug-in that supports both C and C++ languages". Sauce Labs is most compared with BrowserStack, Perfecto, LambdaTest, Bitbar and Tricentis Tosca, whereas SonarQube is most compared with Checkmarx One, SonarCloud, Coverity, Veracode and GitHub Advanced Security.
We monitor all Functional Testing Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.