We performed a comparison between Temenos Quantum and Xamarin Platform based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Mobile Development Platforms solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."The most valuable feature is usability. You can develop components inside it and reuse them in different parts of your application, wherever needed. You can replicate them. There's also a Quantum Fabric on the back end, which provides a middle layer between your database and the third-party systems you need to integrate. It also provides the integration to handle all sorts of exceptions and timeouts on the Fabric. This makes it easy to troubleshoot errors coming from third-party APIs."
"With the new VM releases, it is a faster product with more abilities that benefit the user."
"You can build your own customized, native, mobile applications in an efficient matter."
"It is an important solution for reducing the development efforts by developing a mobile application efficiently, in a shorter period of time, across multiple platforms, such as Android and iOS."
"It is a single platform that can cater to mobile and web development requirements, making it convenient for businesses looking to transition into the digital space."
"The best feature is the Kony Studio, which is the product that is used to develop interfaces."
"We can use a single channel to create an interface for iOS, Android, and other channels."
"The initial setup of Temenos Quantum was easy."
"It usually saves time for application development. We write once and the code works everywhere."
"Being able to use the .NET framework and platform have me creating applications better than anyone who develops on Windows."
"It allows us to reuse our knowledge of C# and .NET Framework."
"The technical support is very good and it's close to native."
"The cross platform ability is a great asset."
"The most valuable feature of the Xamarin Platform is the deployment."
"Xamarin makes it easy to create white label applications for all platforms."
"A single line of code works with android and iOS."
"It would be highly beneficial if future iterations of Temenos could incorporate support for QR-based payment methods, as it would enhance the platform's capabilities and align it more closely with modern payment trends"
"We would like to have widgets for graphs and analytics, as well as the integration of machine learning."
"There is definitely room for improvement, especially in the areas of AI, AR, and DR for mobile and web applications"
"Temenos Quantum is not quite stable yet."
"Some features are only enabled for paid users. It would be much better if they enabled those features without having to pay. I would also like to see them publish information about future technologies on the Home screen under a separate tab. That would be an improvement."
"One area where Temenos Quantum could improve is in the flexibility of widgets and additional libraries."
"There are many issues when integrating with native sides when building an Android application of the retail accelerator or an iOS application of the retail actuator. We have to incorporate on the native side of things, which creates a lot of issues. Temenos Quantum is a proprietary product and not open source. There is not much information available on the internet for developers to reference when solving issues. You have to contact the help desk, who will then give you an appointment and work to resolve the issue. In terms of what Temenos can do better, they can make the product more mature so that we do not encounter as many black holes when encountering an issue."
"The UI lacks flexibility, especially regarding customizations. There are numerous issues at the fabric end, and working with the visualizer is extremely challenging. Basic development tasks require a high-end machine, and even clicking on an icon initiates a thirty-second processing time. The challenges mainly revolve around fabric and content."
"The worst build issue concerns are the caching process MSBuild uses to reduce the build time."
"Regarding improvements, there are still some limitations with Xamarin, particularly regarding access to core functionality in Android and iOS."
"There are compatibility issues between versions of various Xamarin components."
"I feel that the Android AppCompat library creates a lot of issues. A lot of development time is often wasted solving these issues."
"I would like to see hot reload, similar to what Flutter has out-of-the-box. There is "Live Reload" but it’s still in preview and was only recently announced."
"We need to think about partnering with IBM because there is a need for a big data partner; someone who has machine learning and can help us connect the app to big data."
"Xamarin Platform can improve by making the enterprise documentation better. There's a lot of basic documentation of how to do many of the functions of the solution, but there's not much enterprise-level documentation."
"The recent move to .NET MAUI is a big change that's affecting a lot of the good features."
Temenos Quantum is ranked 9th in Mobile Development Platforms with 15 reviews while Xamarin Platform is ranked 4th in Mobile Development Platforms with 39 reviews. Temenos Quantum is rated 7.2, while Xamarin Platform is rated 8.2. The top reviewer of Temenos Quantum writes "Though a secure tool for building applications, there is a need to improve its stability". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Xamarin Platform writes "It's about to be retired and replaced with an inferior product, but offers excellent cross-platform development capabilities". Temenos Quantum is most compared with OutSystems, Microsoft Azure App Service and ServiceNow, whereas Xamarin Platform is most compared with Ionic, Appium, OutSystems, Apple Xcode and Mendix. See our Temenos Quantum vs. Xamarin Platform report.
See our list of best Mobile Development Platforms vendors.
We monitor all Mobile Development Platforms reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
