We performed a comparison between Amazon API Gateway and webMethods.io API based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two API Management solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."It is a stable solution."
"This solution gives you a unified way to have your API accessed."
"It provides the flexibility to configure, switch, and manage configurations through cloud permissions or performance settings."
"This solution is useful for making new APIs."
"Amazon API Gateway facilitates our serverless architecture, particularly with Lambda, by allowing us to perform various tasks. For instance, Lambda functions authorize API calls, execute multiple workloads, and integrate with other services like Azure and Kubernetes. Additionally, we leverage Lambda functions behind the Amazon API Gateway to query databases, process data, and interact with different systems."
"It is very helpful, with our API-based applications."
"The solution is solid, robust, and scalable."
"The best thing about Amazon API Gateway is that it can authenticate and authorize requests without going to our back end."
"Clients choose webMethods.io API for its intuitive interface, promoting seamless interaction and quick communication between systems."
"The performance is good."
"Amazon API Gateway is not as complete as Apigee and needs to be improved by adding more features to become a more robust application."
"The pricing could be improved. In cases where customers require real-time sync or real-time calling groups with IoT, the volume of data and time lag become a concern."
"The user interface could be improved, as well as customer support and having a local customer representative in a country."
"We would like to see more UI-based monitoring."
"Monitoring could be improved."
"Since the first invocation of AWS Lambda takes more than 30 seconds because of Lambda's cold start, Amazon API Gateway blocks that resource, thereby aborting the invocation."
"The API Gateway lacks the capability to directly facilitate API strategy development or user onboarding workflows."
"I believe better governance and monitoring features would be beneficial."
"A potential drawback of webMethods.io API is its adaptability to legacy systems, which can vary in compatibility."
"I would like the solution to provide bi-weekly updates."
Amazon API Gateway is ranked 3rd in API Management with 37 reviews while webMethods.io API is ranked 30th in API Management with 2 reviews. Amazon API Gateway is rated 8.2, while webMethods.io API is rated 8.0. The top reviewer of Amazon API Gateway writes "Easy initial setup and highly stable solution". On the other hand, the top reviewer of webMethods.io API writes "Offers a strategic toolset for gradual integration advancement". Amazon API Gateway is most compared with Microsoft Azure API Management, MuleSoft Anypoint API Manager, Apigee, WSO2 API Manager and Kong Gateway Enterprise, whereas webMethods.io API is most compared with Apigee and MuleSoft Anypoint API Manager. See our Amazon API Gateway vs. webMethods.io API report.
See our list of best API Management vendors.
We monitor all API Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.