We performed a comparison between Amazon S3 and Oracle Cloud Object Storage based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Public Cloud Storage Services solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."The solution auto-scales so it is easily scalable."
"It's good for starting up because you only pay for what you use."
"We find the archival capabilities of this solution quite valuable, because we can have set policies of exactly when, and what to archive."
"Amazon S3 is easy to use and it is beneficial to use the CLI to make the backups. Since I use the CLI I do not have to do it on a web portal which is a big advantage because everything can be automatized. Automation can be done very well in Amazon S3."
"I don't have any problems with the solution. It's issue-free."
"The most valuable feature of Amazon S3 is the data transfer acceleration because it can enable fast, easy, and secure data transfer."
"We've had no issues with stability."
"The integration with Cloudfront helps in fetching the static phase and default phases in case our actual service is down."
"The most valuable features of the tool are scalability and security."
"One key feature is that you can make buckets private, requiring pre-authentication and using a specific URL for access. Additionally, the buckets are encrypted by default. The flexibility of public or private buckets and how you grant access are vital security features."
"The solution's most valuable features are its speed, unlimited space, and simplicity of use."
"Maybe they need to expand their range of physical locations."
"I would like there to be more support without needing to use Transfer Family."
"We have used the support from Amazon S3. The support is expensive and could be reduced."
"The only pain point is migrating the life cycle policy because if someone is a newbie, they cannot easily create the life cycle policy."
"Could include some additional security features."
"The support is better than other cloud providers but sometimes it takes a while to have a resolution to our issues."
"The solution's cost should be improved."
"I would like a batch downloading option added to the AWS console."
"The solution should provide more customization and the possibility of doing more manual tasks."
"Sometimes, there are glitches with applying policies. Even when the policy is correct, it might not work consistently. We need to troubleshoot to see if it's a user error or if the policy itself needs adjustment. It usually works after refreshing, but that inconsistency is a minor complexity."
"Oracle Cloud Object Storage needs to have an additional bucket for security."
Amazon S3 is ranked 1st in Public Cloud Storage Services with 70 reviews while Oracle Cloud Object Storage is ranked 11th in Public Cloud Storage Services with 3 reviews. Amazon S3 is rated 8.8, while Oracle Cloud Object Storage is rated 9.0. The top reviewer of Amazon S3 writes "Cloud Conversations: AWS S3 Overview". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Oracle Cloud Object Storage writes "A scalable solution that helps to store and share files securely ". Amazon S3 is most compared with Microsoft Azure File Storage, NetApp Cloud Volumes ONTAP, Amazon S3 Glacier, Google Cloud Storage and Wasabi, whereas Oracle Cloud Object Storage is most compared with Microsoft Azure Object Storage, Amazon EFS (Elastic File System), Oracle Database Backup Service, Google Cloud Storage and Amazon EBS (Elastic Block Store). See our Amazon S3 vs. Oracle Cloud Object Storage report.
See our list of best Public Cloud Storage Services vendors.
We monitor all Public Cloud Storage Services reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.