We performed a comparison between Microsoft Azure Object Storage and Oracle Cloud Object Storage based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Public Cloud Storage Services solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."Technical support has been excellent."
"With Microsoft Azure Object Storage, they are an open market."
"The features of Microsoft Azure Object Storage that are most valuable are the ones providing encryption. Access is more controlled using private endpoints and SaaS token keys. Many access control features exist."
"The most important thing for me is reliability."
"We use the product for storage, documentation, and reporting."
"Technical support is excellent."
"The most valuable feature of Microsoft Azure Object Storage is that it is on the cloud."
"The tool's most valuable feature is performance."
"One key feature is that you can make buckets private, requiring pre-authentication and using a specific URL for access. Additionally, the buckets are encrypted by default. The flexibility of public or private buckets and how you grant access are vital security features."
"The solution's most valuable features are its speed, unlimited space, and simplicity of use."
"The most valuable features of the tool are scalability and security."
"The stability of the product is an area with certain shortcomings where improvements are required."
"We would like it if we did not have to use another encryption solution to encrypt the storage."
"Its user interface could be better."
"The initial setup could be more straightforward. It would be best if you had a little bit of training or an understanding of the concepts. It's important because if you don't do that, then you might end up not following the best practices. Then you will learn it the hard way by making mistakes and then know that you shouldn't have done this or that. It's better to attend workshops and take a hands-on approach."
"The solution's stability should be improved."
"I would like to have out-of-the-box connectors to make integration with other products easier."
"Microsoft Azure Object Storage needs to improve stability and cloud user interface."
"Microsoft Azure Object Storage is a pretty expensive solution."
"Oracle Cloud Object Storage needs to have an additional bucket for security."
"The solution should provide more customization and the possibility of doing more manual tasks."
"Sometimes, there are glitches with applying policies. Even when the policy is correct, it might not work consistently. We need to troubleshoot to see if it's a user error or if the policy itself needs adjustment. It usually works after refreshing, but that inconsistency is a minor complexity."
More Microsoft Azure Object Storage Pricing and Cost Advice →
Microsoft Azure Object Storage is ranked 10th in Public Cloud Storage Services with 45 reviews while Oracle Cloud Object Storage is ranked 11th in Public Cloud Storage Services with 3 reviews. Microsoft Azure Object Storage is rated 8.0, while Oracle Cloud Object Storage is rated 9.0. The top reviewer of Microsoft Azure Object Storage writes "Can be used to safely store big datasets in the cloud at a reasonable price". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Oracle Cloud Object Storage writes "A scalable solution that helps to store and share files securely ". Microsoft Azure Object Storage is most compared with Wasabi and Amazon S3, whereas Oracle Cloud Object Storage is most compared with Amazon S3, Amazon EFS (Elastic File System), Oracle Database Backup Service, Google Cloud Storage and Amazon EBS (Elastic Block Store). See our Microsoft Azure Object Storage vs. Oracle Cloud Object Storage report.
See our list of best Public Cloud Storage Services vendors.
We monitor all Public Cloud Storage Services reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.