We performed a comparison between AppDynamics and Avantra based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."The most valuable feature is the detailed statistics, like the consumer count, for the ActiveMQ server."
"Once you get past installation, AppDynamics is highly stable and we get good results."
"Transition tracing is the most valuable is pretty easy and useful, but the user experience piece is also good."
"Provides monitoring more around business processes versus just servers, applications, etc. E.g., with complex systems, where a business process passes across multiple applications, the business needs us to monitor the heath of the process, not just a segment of the application."
"AppDynamics is easy to implement if you follow the documentation, and the documentation that they provide is good."
"The most valuable feature of AppDynamics is Proactive Monitoring and Alerting."
"That visual representation’s been really good, also the overhead that AppDynamics creates is quite small. We've tried Dynatrace in the past. Some of the applications didn't work as well with Dynatrace."
"We can make custom alerts in our system for specific issues like high CPU utilization or application downtime."
"It's very easy to manage and use."
"You can customize alerts based on need."
"The most valuable feature of Avantra is automation. The reduction of manual work and having them automated is one of the top reasons why I would use it."
"It would help to maybe have a more graphical interface and more user-friendly graphics."
"The dashboard can be better. Also, the automated reports could be improved."
"As per my experience, the drill-down feature can be improved at the class level."
"There are too many installers available for this solution."
"AppDynamics should improve its ability to track all the transactions."
"It is stable, but the only downside is the licensing part."
"SQL statement monitoring"
"The UI could use a little help."
"We are currently exploring automation options for various areas, and Avantra should consider implementing automation for change request management, an area they have not yet ventured into. While Avantra is currently excelling in monitoring and system refreshes, there is scope for improvement in automating change request management. In addition to primarily focusing on SAP, Avantra currently performs kernel patches which are core SAP patches. However, exploring more into OS patching could be another potential area for Avantra to expand its automation capabilities."
"The dashboard needs to improve."
"The machine-learning is lacking and should be improved."
AppDynamics is ranked 5th in Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability with 155 reviews while Avantra is ranked 39th in Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability with 5 reviews. AppDynamics is rated 8.2, while Avantra is rated 8.6. The top reviewer of AppDynamics writes "Very good real-time monitoring capabilities, deep problem diagnosis, and transaction mapping". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Avantra writes "User-friendly, simple to set up and easy to configure". AppDynamics is most compared with Dynatrace, Elastic Observability, Datadog, Splunk Enterprise Security and New Relic, whereas Avantra is most compared with Datadog, Dynatrace and OpsRamp. See our AppDynamics vs. Avantra report.
See our list of best Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability vendors.
We monitor all Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.