We performed a comparison between Armis and Tenable Vulnerability Management based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Risk-Based Vulnerability Management solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."The technology is good."
"The tool is user-friendly and helps to detect vulnerabilities."
"The most valuable feature of the solution is asset tracking."
"Armis is a straightforward and user-friendly solution."
"The most valuable feature for me is container scanning because I am interested in CICD security."
"It's a recommended tool for penetration testers because it's effective for that purpose."
"They are on a good trajectory as a company and investing in R&D in the right ways."
"The solution is easy to use and configuration is smooth with no complexities."
"Tenable.io, in particular, is quite a powerful product. It looks at your traditional environment, which is pretty much anything that is on-premises, and it also goes a step ahead and covers your modern assets, which is anything that is currently sitting in the cloud. You get complete visibility of your entire environment and tech operation. The ability to give you visibility across the entire tech surface is one of the biggest advantages that Tenable.io has."
"It is a stable solution. Stability-wise, I rate the solution a ten out of ten."
"It is a very, very user-friendly tool...The setup is easy"
"The solution is quite friendly."
"We face difficulties in integrating the product with ticketing tools like ServiceNow."
"We have faced issues with the tool's stability."
"The solution's vulnerability testing could be improved."
"Armis doesn't have a back intel feature."
"The only drawback of the solution is that it is expensive."
"The product could be easier to set up on the cloud."
"It would be helpful if Tenable could be more clear with regard to everything the solution can and cannot do with the particular license that you have."
"Another area of improvement is customer service and support. Tenable needs to include support in the pricing/license. Currently, they push clients to get support from partners or channel distributors, who often charge a lot."
"We'd like to see a bit more user-friendliness."
"The solution seems to focus too much on enterprises, and they really need a product that works for SMBs."
"The stability has room for improvement."
"I would like the solution to cover the whole cycle of mitigation since it's an area where the solution currently lacks."
More Tenable Vulnerability Management Pricing and Cost Advice →
Armis is ranked 13th in Risk-Based Vulnerability Management with 4 reviews while Tenable Vulnerability Management is ranked 2nd in Risk-Based Vulnerability Management with 39 reviews. Armis is rated 8.0, while Tenable Vulnerability Management is rated 8.2. The top reviewer of Armis writes "Improves device visibility and adapts according to an organization’s security demands". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Tenable Vulnerability Management writes "Discovers vulnerabilities and integrates well with other solutions". Armis is most compared with Nozomi Networks, Forescout Platform, Claroty Platform, Axonius and Phosphorus Cybersecurity, whereas Tenable Vulnerability Management is most compared with Tenable Security Center, Tenable Nessus, Qualys VMDR, Amazon Inspector and Wiz. See our Armis vs. Tenable Vulnerability Management report.
See our list of best Risk-Based Vulnerability Management vendors.
We monitor all Risk-Based Vulnerability Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
