We performed a comparison between Aruba Networks Wireless WAN and Ubiquiti Wireless based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Wireless WAN solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."Aruba Wireless's best feature is that it's very, very robust."
"The most valuable feature is reliability."
"I believe their Adaptive Radio Management (ARM) in its current form provides the best automated management of transmit power and channel. It does a really good job of managing proper design and wireless environment."
"It integrates with the Aruba portfolio very easily, and it's a vendor-agnostic solution, and that's brilliant."
"The initial setup of Aruba Networks Wireless WAN can be done quickly, and everything functions smoothly."
"What I like most about Aruba Networks Wireless WAN is seamless integration from an endpoint perspective. Another valuable feature of the product is that it supports certificate-based authentication."
"The most valuable feature of Aruba Networks Wireless WAN is centralized management. It has features like other solutions, but it's easier to manage. Aruba Networks Wireless WAN also has a tax asset benefit which is good."
"An engineer with enough experience can tune the network however they want. It's crucial. It's good to customize our information security how we like it and configure the solution to achieve the level of stability we need."
"The ease of the setup is one of its most valuable aspects."
"Very simple, very basic setup for Ubiquiti Wireless. Its performance in a home or small business setting with fewer access points is fantastic."
"We use the solution for many of our smaller customers and the cloud management aspect of the solution is very good. If you compare it to other vendors that have a controller, it's much easier to manage the cloud-based solution because we travel a lot. It allows us to manage everything from any place."
"The solution is easy to use and flexible."
"The most valuable feature is the ease of setup."
"The indoor WiFi connection works well."
"The scalability of Ubiquiti Wireless is very good. We can add and transfer access points, it is highly scalable."
"Ubiquiti Wireless is very scalable. I don't know that there's a limit to the scalability. We just add more data switches to power more access points. We haven't come across a situation where it can't handle the Ubiquiti equipment."
"The solution should be cheaper."
"Support is not good...The support can be improved, especially in India, since whenever I require support, it takes some time."
"There is room for improvement in the pricing, it's quite a premium."
"The issue is that we are unable to update it because we lack the necessary permissions. We set up the website, but we don't have permission to download the software."
"It works. We don't look at it any deeper than that and don't find any features ar missing."
"What needs to improve in Aruba Networks Wireless WAN is the support because it takes quite a long time for the support team to resolve issues. Whenever a new version or update is released, my company sees many bugs and issues, so that is another area for improvement as well."
"Aruba Networks Wireless WAN could improve the solution availability. The selection of mounting hardware for the various radios is limited and poor. Often, you have to create and manufacture your own mounting hardware in certain situations."
"Aruba's technical support has room for improvement."
"Could be more secure and the controller more user-friendly."
"I would like to see more cloud features that some of the other competitors such as Cisco Meraki have that are very nice."
"There isn't any technical support."
"The cost is on the higher side and could be lower."
"In Ukraine at least, it's a problem when it comes to buying the hardware. For example, I made a request for 20 switches a few months ago. The solution needs to have worldwide availability."
"After upgrades to the interface, some features disappear."
"Ubiquiti isn't as good for larger networks as any of the other wireless solutions. It lacks performance, coverage, and some of the advanced capabilities other solutions have."
"Ubiquiti Wireless could improve by being more user-friendly and easy to use."
Aruba Networks Wireless WAN is ranked 5th in Wireless WAN with 47 reviews while Ubiquiti Wireless is ranked 1st in Wireless WAN with 68 reviews. Aruba Networks Wireless WAN is rated 8.4, while Ubiquiti Wireless is rated 8.0. The top reviewer of Aruba Networks Wireless WAN writes "It's reliable, cost-effective, and easy to troubleshoot". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Ubiquiti Wireless writes "It's cheap and easy to use but isn't suitable for large deployments or complex use cases ". Aruba Networks Wireless WAN is most compared with Cambium Networks Wireless WAN and Fortinet FortiWLM, whereas Ubiquiti Wireless is most compared with Ruckus Wireless WAN, Cisco Meraki Wireless LAN, Cambium Networks Wireless WAN, Aruba Wireless and Cisco Wireless WAN. See our Aruba Networks Wireless WAN vs. Ubiquiti Wireless report.
See our list of best Wireless WAN vendors.
We monitor all Wireless WAN reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.