We performed a comparison between Aruba Networks Wireless WAN and Cambium Networks Wireless WAN based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Wireless WAN solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."The most valuable feature of Aruba Networks Wireless WAN is centralized management capability. You don't have to have wireless LAN controllers at every location."
"The most valuable feature of this solution is the streaming of screen sharing."
"The initial setup of Aruba Networks Wireless WAN can be done quickly, and everything functions smoothly."
"In the event of a controller appliance failure or downtime, the system seamlessly transitions control to any access point acting as a backup controller."
"The most valuable feature is reliability."
"Aruba Networks Wireless WAN is stable and good."
"I rate the support an eight out of ten since it is good."
"It's stable and reliable."
"It is highly scalable. I would rate the scalability a ten out of ten."
"The initial setup is easy to handle. It's quite simple."
"The solution's coverage range is good, it is easy to use, and deployment is very easy and user-friendly."
"One could say that Cambium is a scalable solution."
"It excels in challenging environments and adverse weather conditions, maintaining high performance without any impact on the link quality."
"The most valuable features for network performance in the solution are reliability and centralized management through a single controller."
"It is easy to deploy and has many specialists to help us handle complicated processes."
"Cambium Networks Wireless WAN is scalable. The XV2 model of the solution can support up to 216 people at a time."
"The only issues are the configuration problems that impact the stability of the solution."
"Sometimes, the configuration part of Aruba Networks Wireless WAN can be complex, and if you fail to understand the product at once, you may not even know about some features that you can apply to your network, and they may go unused."
"The integration, pricing, and configuration could always be improved upon."
"The product should improve Aruba Central."
"The customization options could be improved."
"The support needs improvement because it is not very good in terms of response time."
"In the next release, the security should be improved by including support for WPA3."
"The initial setup is complex."
"The solution's price could be better."
"If someone wants to go to the location-based portal of the product, like the one available in Meraki, it would not be possible, and it is an area that needs improvement."
"The range of the product is disappointing so far."
"The Wifi coverage and throughput performance of Cambium could improve."
"The installation and configuration are a bit complex."
"If it's in a warehouse, it is very hard to deploy."
"The Cambium user interface and configuration should be improved."
"The product could have more access points to increase the network coverage."
More Cambium Networks Wireless WAN Pricing and Cost Advice →
Aruba Networks Wireless WAN is ranked 5th in Wireless WAN with 47 reviews while Cambium Networks Wireless WAN is ranked 3rd in Wireless WAN with 24 reviews. Aruba Networks Wireless WAN is rated 8.4, while Cambium Networks Wireless WAN is rated 8.6. The top reviewer of Aruba Networks Wireless WAN writes "It's reliable, cost-effective, and easy to troubleshoot". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Cambium Networks Wireless WAN writes "Provides point-to-point and point-to-multipoint connectivity and user-friendly solution". Aruba Networks Wireless WAN is most compared with Ubiquiti Wireless, Fortinet FortiWLM and Cisco Meraki Wireless LAN, whereas Cambium Networks Wireless WAN is most compared with Ubiquiti Wireless, Ruckus Wireless WAN and Cisco Wireless WAN. See our Aruba Networks Wireless WAN vs. Cambium Networks Wireless WAN report.
See our list of best Wireless WAN vendors.
We monitor all Wireless WAN reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.