We performed a comparison between Blue Prism and Tungsten RPA based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Robotic Process Automation (RPA) solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."If there is a task that Blue Prism cannot do out of the box, Blue Prism provides me the facility of designing one and integrating it into the application. This process is called Visual Basic Objects."
"One key feature is the workflow design is able to be customized according to the way that you want the automation to work."
"I like the cloud features such as IADA and Decipher."
"All of the processes that we've automated have been completed successfully, and the bots are able to process them as expected."
"There are simple things you can put in place that help you understand workflow and how implementation acts."
"As a developer, I liked the layout and UI, specifically referring to testing. I was able to watch the process through stages."
"Blue Prism is a great enterprise and it has offered the solutions that I have been needing in order to give my organization an RPA."
"The only good thing about Blue Prism is the execution speed."
"The pricing of the solution is quite good."
"The ability to script information from websites is most valuable. It also seems to be fairly robust and reasonably easy to manage on a server-based deployment. We have a number of robots operating on the central server."
"The product provides end-to-end solutions for different business problems."
"Kofax RPA's best feature is its high success percentage in picking up information from documents, especially where the DPI is really low."
"The most valuable feature is the robotic process."
"The flexibility to use already-developed components is really good. You can use it for Excel-related operations and other things."
"The product saves time and resources."
"The product provided all the security controls that we asked them."
"Blue Prism can improve on the ease of use of its graphic user interface(GUI)."
"We would like to have something, not particularly within the tool, that gives flexibility to the end-users to schedule the bots themselves. There should be some kind of control room flexibility so that they can go in. We don't have to always keep that centralized with us. We would also like to have inbuilt scheduling and resource pooling to distribute the bots on servers from within the platform. I should be able to distribute or orchestrate them internally so that if one bot takes a little longer than planned, it automatically shifts to another server. We would also like its price to be lower."
"Our primary challenge at present is that we are finding it difficult to get additional business insights into existing processes so that we can identify where we need to improve."
"For developers, they should have some kind of recording feature."
"The initial setup and deployment could be simplified."
"I don't like that it is so limited, anything that you do feels limited in your capabilities."
"They should incorporate more functionalities in the analytics tool."
"Occasionally, there may be stability issues where certain nodes begin to behave erratically and produce errors."
"It needs a free training portal for anybody on the internet to use so that they can get an idea of what the possibilities are."
"The scalability has room for improvement."
"The product needs more AI capabilities."
"RPA technology is constantly changing, and sometimes Kofax lags behind."
"Kofax RPA's UI could be more user-friendly."
"The interface could be better from a usability standpoint."
"We are on version 10.6, and the current version seems to be 11. Kofax is cycling the capabilities of the product very quickly. One of the difficulties has been to actually keep up with the capabilities as they've evolved. On the one hand, it is good that the product is getting better, but on the other hand, it is difficult to implement the best way with a product that is evolving constantly."
"I would like to see them further enhance the OCR, specifically in the multi-language support."
Blue Prism is ranked 4th in Robotic Process Automation (RPA) with 86 reviews while Tungsten RPA is ranked 12th in Robotic Process Automation (RPA) with 24 reviews. Blue Prism is rated 7.8, while Tungsten RPA is rated 7.4. The top reviewer of Blue Prism writes "Way more efficient for debugging than other tools but the UI is complicated". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Tungsten RPA writes "A stable product that provides end-to-end solutions for different business problems". Blue Prism is most compared with Microsoft Power Automate, UiPath, Automation Anywhere (AA), Pega Robotic Process Automation and Blue Prism Cloud, whereas Tungsten RPA is most compared with UiPath, Microsoft Power Automate, Automation Anywhere (AA), Tungsten TotalAgility and SAS Data Management. See our Blue Prism vs. Tungsten RPA report.
See our list of best Robotic Process Automation (RPA) vendors.
We monitor all Robotic Process Automation (RPA) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.