We performed a comparison between BMC FootPrints Service Core and ServiceNow based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two IT Service Management (ITSM) solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."Implemented system-wide process for approving and tracking "employee move" requests for over 15,000 employees."
"We can track issues easier and run reports on issues to see if there are patterns."
"Having a one stop shop for linked assets and tickets has improved end user adoption and led to a reduction in phone/email tickets."
"The discovery feature is very flexible."
"It has helped the help desk team. We get our tickets in and are able to support our customers, the end-users, with this solution."
"This product solidly handles incident management, problem management, and change management."
"I think the most important feature is the ability to receive valuable ticket status support in a timely manner with little to no downtime interruptions."
"Technical support is good."
"I like the reporting aspect of it. It helps us know where we stand regarding the types of issues we're receiving... It also shows us trends. That enables us to possibly predict an issue that might come up in the future as well as what is happening right now. We will like that feature. With it, we can either avoid certain issues or know where we need to focus more regarding the service we provide."
"What I like the most is the functionality, it's features are rich, and there is a high degree of compliance with IT standards."
"It allows us to filter the data, create graphs, and get detailed reports."
"If it is a high priority, they will respond very quickly. If it is a low priority issue, it might take some time, some three or four days. I would rate the technical support as a 10 out of 10."
"It can scale well if you are managing IT assets."
"ServiceNow is a very powerful tool that can perform a lot of different functions."
"The solution has a user-friendly interface."
"HR Case Management and Customer Service Management are two of the key areas which clients are using."
"Reporting could be improved along with the option to create more fine tuned reports and to create specific fields for each type of ticket."
"It would be nice if they added the ability to go directly to a form via a deep link URL."
"The mobile version of this product does not support asset management."
"The workflow should be made to be more user-friendly. It should also have more granular scalability."
"We need more customizable reporting functionality. We could also use more collaboration of service desk tickets. This will allow for two departments to share the same information, track the progress of the total task scope no matter how complex the request is."
"Hyphens are not allowed in the quick search bar. This has created a problem in our environment where we use hyphens in our asset names."
"It would be better if it were more user-friendly. The reporting part in the version we have is a little complicated. It takes too long to build and report. It would also be better if there were another way to manage notifications."
"It is pretty clunky and not very intuitive. Even though I have used it for many years, I don't think it is a very good ITSM platform in general. In the telecom space, a lot of telco providers use this solution, but from my perspective, it is not very user friendly. It is a bit more laborious. There are still too many human touchpoints. There can be a little bit more automation. It would also be good to integrate it with other tools. Integration is quite difficult, especially in the telco space."
"An area for improvement would be the accessibility of downloaded and compressed files."
"The biggest complaint I have is that the ServiceNow search engine is not very robust."
"Before implementing this solution, you should have the ITSM model in place for chain management requests. That is a prerequisite because you cannot perform tasks without it."
"The solution is lacking in the mobile application area that could be improved."
"Their cloud management is also not that great compared to other products."
"It's not very secure, it's web-based, and I prefer Remedy. Both the security and the web interface could be improved."
"I would like to see Advanced Intelligent Automation."
"The pricing of the solution could be better. It's a bit high."
BMC FootPrints Service Core is ranked 26th in IT Service Management (ITSM) with 10 reviews while ServiceNow is ranked 1st in IT Service Management (ITSM) with 212 reviews. BMC FootPrints Service Core is rated 8.2, while ServiceNow is rated 8.4. The top reviewer of BMC FootPrints Service Core writes "Scalability is customizable but it is somewhat limited in terms of how granular it can be". On the other hand, the top reviewer of ServiceNow writes "A stable and scalable solution that has excellent features and is useful for collecting data and building KPIs". BMC FootPrints Service Core is most compared with , whereas ServiceNow is most compared with BMC Helix ITSM, Microsoft Power Apps, Pega BPM, IBM Maximo and Appian. See our BMC FootPrints Service Core vs. ServiceNow report.
See our list of best IT Service Management (ITSM) vendors and best Help Desk Software vendors.
We monitor all IT Service Management (ITSM) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.