We performed a comparison between Boomi iPaaS and SAP Cloud Platform based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Integration Platform as a Service (iPaaS) solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."The iPaaS functionality is very mature. The browser based IDE is also very mature and stable."
"The platform is user-friendly."
"Boomi AtomSphere Integration is stable."
"We work on the flow between systems and the most valuable features for that purpose are the mapping of data, interface mapping, and data integration."
"I have found the solution to be scalable."
"Very effective with its drag-and-drop feature."
"It has been a stable product."
"The product's integration features are quite rich and low code. It is easy to use."
"The most valuable feature is the data synchronization, or the push and pull of the data."
"The product is very stable."
"The pre-delivered content from the SAP cloud platform is definitely a strength."
"Feature-wise, I like it since it allows you to integrate with multiple applications. There are available connectors that allow you to integrate."
"Great Integration Suite, with CPI being its stable component."
"The ability to expand it whenever required has been great — it's very simple."
"The mapping transformation allows us to connect our on-premise ECC to the cloud system."
"The solution has a lot of great features."
"In day-to-day operations, tracking transactions is a major challenge. It takes hours to track a single transaction. It is not a straightforward process."
"The product could be a little bit more user-friendly."
"There are more mature (dedicated) API management and master data management (MDM) solutions available in the market."
"There are still some areas that need improvement. For example, when updates are going on, the product becomes very slow."
"Documentation could be improved."
"Boomi AtomSphere Integration should scale up on the migration area."
"The solution is complex. There's a few items and features that are hard to understand. They should work to simplify the functionality so new users don't struggle."
"There should be more scripting possibilities."
"I would like to see more and better support for data transformations."
"The areas I think this solution should improve are monitoring and adapting."
"Lacks flexibility in its licensing structure."
"When they innovate too fast, they end up confusing their customers."
"I want to see better pricing from the SAP Cloud Platform in the future. I also want more security and scalability from it."
"I'd like to see more local integration."
"They are still developing this product. It does not really have 100% of the necessary features available to properly service business clients"
"I would like for it to have integration to GitHub."
Boomi iPaaS is ranked 5th in Integration Platform as a Service (iPaaS) with 25 reviews while SAP Cloud Platform is ranked 4th in Integration Platform as a Service (iPaaS) with 38 reviews. Boomi iPaaS is rated 7.8, while SAP Cloud Platform is rated 7.8. The top reviewer of Boomi iPaaS writes "Stable product, suitable for limited integrations and lacks flexibility ". On the other hand, the top reviewer of SAP Cloud Platform writes "Provides seamless integration with CTI for streamlined data synchronization but complexity and challenges in migrating existing applications to the low-code model for custom application development". Boomi iPaaS is most compared with Microsoft Azure Logic Apps, webMethods Integration Server, SSIS, Oracle Integration Cloud Service and AWS Glue, whereas SAP Cloud Platform is most compared with Amazon AWS, Microsoft Azure, Google Cloud, Mule Anypoint Platform and webMethods.io Integration. See our Boomi iPaaS vs. SAP Cloud Platform report.
See our list of best Integration Platform as a Service (iPaaS) vendors.
We monitor all Integration Platform as a Service (iPaaS) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.