We performed a comparison between Mule Anypoint Platform and SAP Cloud Platform based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Integration Platform as a Service (iPaaS) solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."The flexibility has been great overall."
"The ability to define multi-tiered APIs and reuse them is a fantastic platform feature."
"The product is very user-friendly."
"The integration potential is excellent."
"The solution's deployment and proxy processes are very good."
"It can scale."
"API management."
"The most valuable feature is the variety of characters Anypoint Platform has. It is very scalable and customizable."
"It’s easy to maintain, as everything is handled by SAP."
"The most valuable features of the SAP Cloud Platform are the extensions and integrations. Additionally, there are a lot of AI-based microservices."
"The dashboard provides pretty good clarity."
"SAP is an excellent company with an excellent reputation, excellent products, and dedicated customer support."
"The product improved our company's business operations since we got value out of it."
"SAP has provided very good support."
"The ability to expand it whenever required has been great — it's very simple."
"The product is very stable."
"Mule Anypoint Platform is complex for beginners. Users without programming skills will find it complex. It should also improve its pricing."
"Adding connectors for new upcoming applications would add extra value to this product."
"The pricing can be a little bit less."
"An on-premise setup requires special skills and you need a lot of professional services."
"Lacks intelligent management data and intelligent mappings."
"The platform's data integration tools need improvement on the processing side."
"The solution is very expensive. They need to work on the pricing."
"It has different types of subscriptions. For platinum or lower subscriptions, there are not too many things that can be done. We don't see many features. They should release a basic version that has logging and monitoring features. These features should come with Mule Anypoint Platform for free instead of making customers pay separately for these features. Its dashboard can be improved to have a lot of charts so that it is easy to visualize information. The utilization part can be improved. The dashboard is good currently, but it can be better. Other solutions like Elastic have a good dashboard, and they allow you to administer the product from the UI. Currently, for RTF, there is a different dashboard or utility. It would be good to include the same utility in the cloud solution. It would be good if there is a centralized repository that includes the links to the information about various troubleshooting issues. The documentation is there currently, and it is good, but the troubleshooting information is too scattered. We have to go to different links to find troubleshooting information. This kind of centralized repository would be helpful for new customers who are implementing this solution. It will be helpful to see different kinds of issues that can occur."
"I'd like to see more local integration."
"I feel that SAP provides the tools, but after that, you are left on your own. It would be better if they provided more support throughout the usage of their solutions."
"Lacks flexibility in its licensing structure."
"The areas I think this solution should improve are monitoring and adapting."
"In person, when the development happens, we were told that it's flexible and customizable. However, sometimes, it's challenging to customize."
"The current pricing model is credit-based. We would like to have more information about the usage of the existing applications."
"The solution’s pricing could be improved."
"The addition of more industry use cases would be an improvement."
Mule Anypoint Platform is ranked 1st in Integration Platform as a Service (iPaaS) with 40 reviews while SAP Cloud Platform is ranked 4th in Integration Platform as a Service (iPaaS) with 38 reviews. Mule Anypoint Platform is rated 8.2, while SAP Cloud Platform is rated 7.8. The top reviewer of Mule Anypoint Platform writes "Robust, reliable, and stable, ensuring high availability for critical integrations". On the other hand, the top reviewer of SAP Cloud Platform writes "Provides seamless integration with CTI for streamlined data synchronization but complexity and challenges in migrating existing applications to the low-code model for custom application development". Mule Anypoint Platform is most compared with MuleSoft Composer, Microsoft Azure Logic Apps, Oracle Integration Cloud Service, SAP Process Orchestration and Azure Data Factory, whereas SAP Cloud Platform is most compared with Amazon AWS, Microsoft Azure, Google Cloud, webMethods.io Integration and Mendix. See our Mule Anypoint Platform vs. SAP Cloud Platform report.
See our list of best Integration Platform as a Service (iPaaS) vendors.
We monitor all Integration Platform as a Service (iPaaS) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
