We performed a comparison between Camunda and OpenText 360 for SharePoint based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Business Process Management (BPM) solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."It is a scalable product. I would rate the scalability a ten out of ten."
"The best feature is the automation."
"Camunda's process diagram creation and deployment is very easy."
"It is very user-friendly compared to IBM BPM. It's much simpler – it's more streamlined. That means even non-technical departments can use it."
"Using the BPMN helps us to have a common shared communication language when discussing processes."
"We like the idea of working with Cawemo because it enables us to keep on working, remotely or not. It allows us to collaborate between areas. It's easy to model and easy to use"
"I love that Camunda is a very developer-friendly platform, and my customers have evaluated the pricing as reasonable."
"Being able to use a Java-based solution makes the product flexible."
"The product has a strong and easy integration with Teams."
"The fact that you can see and create something that fits your business is the most valuable thing in this platform. It is a customizable product, so it fits your needs."
"This solution has good connection and we do not need to migrate everything in order to protect the repository."
"OpenText 360's best features are platform independence and its performance when searching large numbers of documents."
"The most valuable features are collaboration, traceability, retention of documents, and search."
"The fact that it allows for the internal sharing of information is very good."
"It's all now on cloud subscription, so you can use all the features without worrying about making the system updates patches."
"We have manual processes, so the workflow enables us to automate a number of these processes."
"I think that Camunda can try to do better when it comes to solving the complexities of all the products in its software stack."
"The cockpit features of the Camunda Platform can be improved to make it a bit more user-friendly, in terms of providing a bit more user experience for non-technical users. There could be some additional documentation added."
"In terms of features, it meets my needs, but I would like Camunda to have an office in Brazil and provide training in Portuguese. They should provide regional support and training courses in Portuguese."
"Community support is basically what I'm looking for. Other than that, it is okay for now."
"I have faced problems in bringing up the Cockpit in terms of GUI processes. I think that there is room for improvement in those areas."
"The migration strategy needs to be improved."
"It lacks some preset features and configurations which would make it more plug-and-play for customers."
"I don't like the UI of the Camunda Platform, I have found the Signavio solution to be much better for me to create the process designs and execute them. Additionally, I have found the tools in the Camunda Platform are not compatible with some of my other tools. They should improve this in the future."
"An area for improvement would be how the platform handles large volumes of documents. It also doesn't provide a very good, robust backup and restore capacity. In the next release, I would like the search technology to be improved."
"We have a very good time to market tool, and the development platform should be made user-friendly. Mostly, it's just support."
"The platform's workflows could be more intuitive and easier to use."
"The graphical user interface had to be more user-friendly. It's not as intuitive."
"The user interface could definitely be improved."
"I would like for there to be even more integrations in the next release and I believe that the price could go down a bit."
"If I have to really create an internal knowledge management portal, if I have to compare SharePoint and WordPress, WordPress is far, far better in regard to the SharePoint option."
"Its licensing needs to be simplified. Currently, its licensing is very complex. It contains a number of pieces, and you have to be an expert in reading all the conditions in the license. They should simplify the licensing and make it easier to understand. It would make a customer's life easier."
Camunda is ranked 1st in Business Process Management (BPM) with 71 reviews while OpenText 360 for SharePoint is ranked 15th in Business Process Management (BPM) with 13 reviews. Camunda is rated 8.2, while OpenText 360 for SharePoint is rated 8.4. The top reviewer of Camunda writes "Open-source, easy to define new processes, and easy to transition to new business process definitions". On the other hand, the top reviewer of OpenText 360 for SharePoint writes "A great, collaborative environment with scalability for many products". Camunda is most compared with Apache Airflow, Bizagi, Pega BPM, IBM BPM and Appian, whereas OpenText 360 for SharePoint is most compared with Apache Airflow, IBM BPM, Bizagi and Adobe Experience Manager (AEM) Forms. See our Camunda vs. OpenText 360 for SharePoint report.
See our list of best Business Process Management (BPM) vendors.
We monitor all Business Process Management (BPM) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
