We performed a comparison between Camunda and Red Hat Polymita Business Suite based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Camunda, Apache, Pega and others in Business Process Management (BPM)."The speed and execution of DMN was a big selling point for us. It's very good at conducting business processes that are easily modeled and presented in a way that's easy to understand."
"We can share, discuss, and develop the model together — from a distance. It's really helped us during these times of isolation."
"The visibility – the diagrams you create – and then being able to automate based on them are valuable features. It's easy to explain and comprehend, and the integration aspects are valuable."
"It is an absolutely stable solution."
"I like everything about the entire BPM that comes with the BPM suite."
"We have the ability to modify the product if we need to, and that comes in handy whenever we need to add new functionality and features."
"The product has a good task management engine."
"The Camunda BPMN Platform is very flexible and gives several options to deploy and scale it."
"The main factor that separates Red Hat software from Oracle, IBM, Pegasystems, is the ability that it gives you to design the screens outside the software and connect it as another component with the BPM engine."
"I would like to have a feature for audit logging, audit logs and audit log management. And some history of use for the audit logs."
"Without a proper frontend, the business cannot effectively use the platform."
"The cockpit features of the Camunda Platform can be improved to make it a bit more user-friendly, in terms of providing a bit more user experience for non-technical users. There could be some additional documentation added."
"The GUI needs to be improved, with more configuration options."
"I would say that Camunda should actually focus on small cases as well. There's a lot of space out there, for small businesses. If they can, they should cater to them."
"There are a few things that I'm missing. For instance, the user interface creator, which I know other systems have, like Aurea or Lombardi, which are IBM solutions. The interface creator, including the data model creator or some module which would allow the users who are not programmers or business consultants and who are not technically skilled in database and Java programming, to create data models and user interfaces."
"The product must provide more videos and training materials."
"Documentation can be improved."
"I think the documentation for the tool, the official documentation, is not as strong as in other tools. You have lot of community. That is good. But sometimes you need - when you are working on a big client or a critical process - to be certain about certain things. So I think that the documentation for the tool, from the company, could be a little stronger."
More Red Hat Polymita Business Suite Pricing and Cost Advice →
Earn 20 points
Camunda is ranked 1st in Business Process Management (BPM) with 71 reviews while Red Hat Polymita Business Suite is ranked 48th in Business Process Management (BPM). Camunda is rated 8.2, while Red Hat Polymita Business Suite is rated 10.0. The top reviewer of Camunda writes "Open-source, easy to define new processes, and easy to transition to new business process definitions". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Red Hat Polymita Business Suite writes "Gives you the ability to design the screens outside the software and connect them as a component with the BPM engine". Camunda is most compared with Apache Airflow, Bizagi, Pega BPM, IBM BPM and Appian, whereas Red Hat Polymita Business Suite is most compared with .
See our list of best Business Process Management (BPM) vendors.
We monitor all Business Process Management (BPM) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.