We performed a comparison between Camunda and Ultimus Adaptive Business Process Management based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Business Process Management (BPM) solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."Camunda Platform is better than IBM BPM, and Azure. It is more elaborate."
"The architecture is good because it's a headless workflow. I can create my own frontend, and it's fully API-based."
"It is an absolutely stable solution."
"We are documenting all of the processors and VPN. Then we are sharing it with our business users."
"The graphical interface is very beneficial."
"The solution is good for data models."
"It is quite easy to build a simple process without any knowledge of programming."
"The BPMN diagram is valuable. For our use case of transferring money from one account to another, the connections have to be done in the traditional financial ways. There are a lot of unexpected errors and a lot of instability with this kind of system, and we are using Camunda in order to have clear flows. With BPMN, I can show a flow to my business partner, and the business team can easily understand what's going on. The technical team can understand what the implementation is, and we can model different errors and the process for recovering from these errors."
"Ultimus Adaptive Business Process Management has good integration with all the other tools we have been using in our company. We use the data that other tools provide in our implementation."
"Development is easy on the Ultimus platform."
"When building interfaces, there are limited tools to work with, especially when dealing with different types of tasks, such as user tasks and system tasks."
"I think it would be important to internationalize the Cockpit and the Admin as well as with the Tasklist."
"The GUI needs to be improved, with more configuration options."
"An improvement would be to support Angular 2 instead of AngularJS, which is quite old."
"I would like to have a feature for audit logging, audit logs and audit log management. And some history of use for the audit logs."
"Customization and tech stack could be up-to-date."
"When trying to design rule tables the solutions graphical user interface could improve, it could be more user friendly."
"While it's very scalable, it would be great if auto-scaling capabilities were added to it... one area that really could help out would be to have dynamic resizing of the cluster. Right now, you have to do capacity planning."
"Ultimus is not good at handling cash transactions. They should add a mobile application in the next release."
"We are looking for a feature that can resign and move the process from one step to another step."
More Ultimus Adaptive Business Process Management Pricing and Cost Advice →
Earn 20 points
Camunda is ranked 1st in Business Process Management (BPM) with 71 reviews while Ultimus Adaptive Business Process Management is ranked 52nd in Business Process Management (BPM). Camunda is rated 8.2, while Ultimus Adaptive Business Process Management is rated 7.6. The top reviewer of Camunda writes "Open-source, easy to define new processes, and easy to transition to new business process definitions". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Ultimus Adaptive Business Process Management writes "Integrates well and helpful support". Camunda is most compared with Apache Airflow, Bizagi, Pega BPM, IBM BPM and Appian, whereas Ultimus Adaptive Business Process Management is most compared with Appian. See our Camunda vs. Ultimus Adaptive Business Process Management report.
See our list of best Business Process Management (BPM) vendors.
We monitor all Business Process Management (BPM) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
