We performed a comparison between Check Point Harmony Endpoint and Fortinet FortiClient based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP) solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."This is stable and scalable."
"It is stable and scalable."
"NGAV and EDR features are outstanding."
"The product detects and blocks threats and is more proactive than firewalls."
"It is a scalable solution...The initial setup of Fortinet FortiEDR was straightforward."
"Having all monitoring, response, tracking, and mitigation tools in one dashboard provides our analysts and SOC team with a comprehensive view at a glance."
"The product's initial setup phase is very easy."
"The console is easy to read. I also like the scanning part and the ability to move assets from one to the other."
"The most valuable feature is the integration with CheckPoint's firewalls. You can have one port, and follow the logs from both Endpoint and firewall security."
"It is integrated with a cloud platform that takes advantage of many emulation features in real-time filtering of malicious attacks."
"One of the coolest features is that it provides an HTML report on the laptop and the endpoint console for the administrator."
"The reporting feature where we can see and monitor what happened on our client computers is useful."
"Check Point Harmony Endpoint has one of the most user-friendly dashboards I've seen."
"The solution has good threat intelligence features."
"Its stability during any heavy performance activity is excellent."
"The communication with the console is very dynamic and remote, without the need to return to the computer locally."
"The EMS server gives us good control and central management."
"It is a scalable product."
"It’s easy to use."
"Fortinet FortiClient is easy to use, and the single-access managed login is pretty good."
"Installation was easy."
"FortiClient's most valuable features are that it's easy to install and connect and has OTP on email IDs and two-factor authentication."
"The return on investment was very reasonable. It was low cost and it functioned, so the return on investment was excellent."
"When the user gets authenticated, I can assign a different VPN or network to each user."
"FortiEDR can be improved by providing more detailed reporting."
"I would like the solution to extend beyond endpoint protection and include other attack surfaces such as other network components."
"The support needs improvement."
"I haven't seen the use of AI in the solution."
"We've encountered challenges during API deployment, occasionally resulting in unstable environments."
"The SIEM could be improved."
"The dashboard isn't easy to access and manage."
"The solution's installation from a central installation server could be improved because the engineers had a little bit of trouble getting it installed from a central location."
"Customization of UI should be a little better in terms of application UI and messages that are displayed when something is blocked or non-compliant."
"The solution needs better reports and centralized logs."
"The solution could be improved in the future with a way to provide online training to customers for free, as other providers do."
"Infinity Portal sometimes requires more performance."
"As I understand there will be a URL filtering feature included with the browser agent in the future. This will allow URL filtering without the need for a Gateway Device. This is something I am looking forward to and would be a great addition to list of features."
"They could be focused on the analysis of USB devices."
"They should provide bandwidth regulation, so we can monitor and regulate bandwidth."
"The response from the tool's support team, which starts with L1, is something my company doesn't find helpful, especially when compared to the other solutions that we use."
"One area that could be improved is cost, but you've got to pay for what you get."
"The solution could be more secure. I would like to see more safety features."
"I would like Fortinet to improve FortiClient's compatibility with macOS."
"The product's performance and pricing could be better."
"The documentation could be improved."
"It would be interesting if the solution offered a way to try to investigate and create a use case to trace vectors."
"It takes too long to install."
"The pricing of the solution should be less expensive."
Check Point Harmony Endpoint is ranked 8th in Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP) with 103 reviews while Fortinet FortiClient is ranked 15th in Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP) with 85 reviews. Check Point Harmony Endpoint is rated 8.8, while Fortinet FortiClient is rated 8.0. The top reviewer of Check Point Harmony Endpoint writes "Excellent anti-ransomware protection, zero-day phishing protection, and web browsing filtering". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Fortinet FortiClient writes "Easy to set up and user-friendly with good support ". Check Point Harmony Endpoint is most compared with Microsoft Defender for Endpoint, CrowdStrike Falcon, Kaspersky Endpoint Security for Business and SentinelOne Singularity Complete, whereas Fortinet FortiClient is most compared with OpenVPN Access Server, Microsoft Defender for Endpoint, Microsoft Azure VPN Gateway, Kaspersky Endpoint Security for Business and Ivanti Connect Secure. See our Check Point Harmony Endpoint vs. Fortinet FortiClient report.
See our list of best Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP) vendors.
We monitor all Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.