We performed a comparison between Dynatrace and Sysdig Monitor based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Container Monitoring solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."It gives us visibility into the product and what we are doing operationally."
"We obtained a better insight into our environment and consolidated a lot of our old apps into one app."
"The most valuable features are the UEM (User Experience Monitoring) and the DEM (Digital Experience Management)."
"Great tool for deep diving into performance data and tracking issues through all the connected systems to better diagnose and pinpoint the real issues."
"It is easy to see what areas you want to alert on and catch."
"Having OneAgent is the most valuable feature of Dyantrace, as well as the monitoring."
"We can report and monitor on specific use cases which could not be monitored with SAP or other tooling."
"It helps to show where the problem is and isolates the issue."
"The ability to stop/pause and capture logs when something happens is the most valuable feature."
"Docker containers are completely supported, kind of like "first class citizens"."
"Beginner video tutorials would really help."
"PurePath exports was a great feature in AppMon, but it is sometimes missing in Dynatrace."
"The dashboard tool needs to be improved. We need more options, because the look and feel is too old-fashioned."
"They should make hooks into some of the more modern performance testing tools a little easier. I think that would go a long way."
"I would like to see single pane monitoring."
"On the side of the end user experience, I would suggest adding a new service for analyzing the backtrace of users."
"Hard to use for beginners, to setup and explore."
"Training is required for all of the people who will be using it, and this should not be overlooked. I would even recommend nominating an SME in each of the three areas covered: user behaviour analysis, development, and infrastructure/operations support."
""Events" reporting (errors, crashes, etc.) is not clear at all in a Mesos environment (i.e., it's not clear what specific container is the one that went down). In a Docker Compose environment, it may be way better."
"It is needs to automate the actions to take when an alert is triggered."
Earn 20 points
Dynatrace is ranked 1st in Container Monitoring with 342 reviews while Sysdig Monitor is ranked 11th in Container Monitoring. Dynatrace is rated 8.8, while Sysdig Monitor is rated 7.6. The top reviewer of Dynatrace writes "AI identifies all the components of a response-time issue or failure, hugely benefiting our triage efforts". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Sysdig Monitor writes "The ability to stop and capture logs when something happens is the most valuable feature". Dynatrace is most compared with Datadog, New Relic, AppDynamics, Splunk Enterprise Security and Azure Monitor, whereas Sysdig Monitor is most compared with CrowdStrike Falcon Cloud Security, Prisma Cloud by Palo Alto Networks and Microsoft Defender for Cloud. See our Dynatrace vs. Sysdig Monitor report.
See our list of best Container Monitoring vendors.
We monitor all Container Monitoring reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
