We performed a comparison between IBM FileNet and Mobius Content Services Platform based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Enterprise Content Management solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."It is very user-friendly for business users. They can create their own searches. They are not dependent on administrators to create searches for them. It is self-service for them."
"I have found that it scales well."
"Gves us the ability to create an end-to-end [document] transaction."
"[The most valuable features are] scalability and ease of use. These features are important because the customer where we have deployed it has millions of documents... And over the last five years, the volume of the documents has been increasing. It's handling all of them and without any errors."
"Provides records management functions."
"The key way that this product has improved the way that that our business functions is by its stability. Its ability to remain up despite other pressures, its consistency, and lack of downtime are really the greatest things that it brings."
"There are a lot of valuable features, but the biggest advantage is that this system is stable; it's always online, it always works... once it's configured and running, we don't need to touch it and constantly make changes to it. It's a low-maintenance platform."
"The usability is very good. We like the Content Navigator. It's very easy to use the search and retrieve for documents and has a lot of options for the user to download documents or send an email."
"It provides a single pane of glass for delivering content from multiple repositories. It is also highly recommended because of the ease of use when it comes to searching and retrieving from multiple repositories simultaneously."
"This solution has improved our organization by providing a central repository for business data with control over sensitive data."
"It is ability to display legacy content needs improvement."
"The usability is fair. It could be a bit better. It could be better designed. They could put more effort into the user experience and do a better job of integrating other components, like Datacap, to be a bit more seamless."
"There is room for improvement in the file management. It's very complex."
"During the initial setup, all the details and different technical things that we were trying to figure out became complex."
"I would say the installation process can be very complicated, and you need to to have an experience resource."
"The new user interface is not easy to set up, so some improvements along these lines would be good."
"We'd like to use the docker, to have it containerized."
"It may be a little complex to implement and take some effort."
"The setup and the support could be improved when it comes to populating the reports from a mainframe environment."
"Sales and service need to be more consistent."
More Mobius Content Services Platform Pricing and Cost Advice →
IBM FileNet is ranked 6th in Enterprise Content Management with 94 reviews while Mobius Content Services Platform is ranked 12th in Enterprise Content Management with 3 reviews. IBM FileNet is rated 8.2, while Mobius Content Services Platform is rated 7.4. The top reviewer of IBM FileNet writes "A document management system that helps in document digitalization and workflow management". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Mobius Content Services Platform writes "Time from creation to access is much better, as reports are immediately available upon generation". IBM FileNet is most compared with SharePoint, OpenText Documentum, OpenText Extended ECM, IBM ECM and Oracle WebCenter, whereas Mobius Content Services Platform is most compared with IBM ECM, SharePoint and Alfresco. See our IBM FileNet vs. Mobius Content Services Platform report.
See our list of best Enterprise Content Management vendors.
We monitor all Enterprise Content Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.