We performed a comparison between IIS and Oracle Fusion Middleware based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Application Server solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."The solution is very simple to use and easy to deploy."
"The graphical user interface makes it easy for users to configure the sites."
"We use the solution for our customer's web applications."
"IIS is useful for the deployment of web applications...Its stability is good."
"It's very easy to publish."
"It's good and offers good usability."
"The most valuable feature of the solution is that it is easy to use and easy to understand."
"The solution is easy to use and connects with Microsoft."
"Oracle Service Bus is the most valuable feature of the solution."
"One good thing, which is a little bit common across all middleware products, is that you can build asynchronous as well as synchronous processes. The SOA part is where it can maintain your state for any state-full integrations. If you have failures, you can replay all that, which is a good part."
"It is really good in terms of features, and it is stable."
"Oracle Fusion is stable."
"Fusion Middleware's main feature for me is that it is quite flexible, and, as middleware, it provides us with all sorts of technology and application adapters, which makes it very handy to use."
"The solution is quite good for applying patches or performing upgrades."
"Data integrity."
"The most valuable features are Oracle Unified Directory and unified identity access management."
"IIS could improve by Microsoft Windows improving the update services. We would like to be able to update all systems that are connected. The WSA service has to be in good order to accomplish this."
"Finding different settings can be difficult if you don't know where to look."
"If Microsoft IIS could work well with AppOptics or things like PHP, Python, and other custom languages that run on the webserver, it would be ideal. I think there are cases where people need to use Apache instead of IIS when IIS doesn't work well with other web languages."
"The platform's stability could be better."
"IIS could improve by having some features related to ASR and HTTPS certificate generation."
"IIS's memory management could be improved."
"The initial setup could be made easier."
"The user interface could be improved."
"The product should improve BPEL features."
"An improvement for Oracle's Fusion Middleware could definitely be found in the SOA component. It's a heavyweight container and, if you ask me, if a product is available as a docker image where we can easily port it in to another Kubernetes platform, that would be perfect. But as for the current situation in the market, nobody is really willing to deploy this on premises."
"One thing that I would like to see is if this product can be containerized. We are moving away from virtual servers and moving more towards containerization to be able to quickly set up environments or have the flexibility of scaling them. It would be good if it can be containerized, and it works well in containerized platforms."
"Its price can be improved. We are currently looking for more cost-efficiency. It should also have a little bit more flexibility for customizations. The customizations should be quicker."
"Oracle Fusion Middleware is based on the regulations in Saudi Arabia and the legislation changes. There is a need to be improvements all the time. It needs to adapt quickly in this market. Additionally, there could be some improvements in the construction sector."
"I would rate the stability a nine out of ten because we did have multiple breakdowns and crashes."
"All areas of HCM modules could use some improvement."
"The main improvement must be made on the user interface. You need to use another Oracle cross in this product. It must be improved and some features of the connectors must be changed."
IIS is ranked 4th in Application Server with 53 reviews while Oracle Fusion Middleware is ranked 6th in Application Server with 12 reviews. IIS is rated 8.0, while Oracle Fusion Middleware is rated 8.0. The top reviewer of IIS writes " A simple and easy-to-use solution but not recommended for public apps". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Oracle Fusion Middleware writes "Maintains top database performance and includes a very good ATB feature". IIS is most compared with NGINX Plus, Apache Web Server, Oracle WebLogic Server, Tomcat and Windows Server AppFabric, whereas Oracle Fusion Middleware is most compared with Oracle WebLogic Server, Tomcat, IBM WebSphere Application Server, JBoss and TIBCO ActiveMatrix. See our IIS vs. Oracle Fusion Middleware report.
See our list of best Application Server vendors.
We monitor all Application Server reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.