We performed a comparison between JBoss Enterprise Application Platform and Microsoft .NET Framework based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Application Infrastructure solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."The most valuable features of this solution are scalability and performance."
"Stable and easy to handle in terms of hosting applications."
"It's convenient and barebone."
"The most valuable aspect of JBoss EAP is its support for clustering and load balancing, which is essential for our applications that serve multiple users simultaneously."
"The solution is quite stable."
"Its technical support is excellent."
"The solution's technical support is very good...The product's initial setup phase was easy."
"The new .NET Core has those middlewares, which are awesome from a security standpoint. With the old Framework or the newer Framework, middleware is basically an event pipeline. You configure and register it, and it handles things centrally. A simple example is logging. With the old Framework, you needed to try/catch blocks everywhere. Here, you configure the logging handler once, and it captures exceptions across the application. I really like the middleware pattern."
"The Windows Communication Foundation is the biggest advantage we get from the .NET Framework."
"The most valuable features for us are web frameworks like MVC, Web API, and WCS."
"A great solution for creating program solutions in a framework for Microsoft Windows quickly and easily."
"The .NET Framework simplified operations dealing with the allocation and deallocation of memory spaces and the additional processing resources."
"I like that ASP.NET is used for the framework and the core web services."
"The web development and Microsoft Windows service development capabilities are among the most valuable features offered by the Microsoft .NET Framework. This language platform is highly user-friendly, with plenty of online examples and information available, as well as a robust development environment."
"Improvement is needed in the synchronization between cluster nodes, especially under network strain."
"Its architecture needs improvement."
"It's hard to find out the root cause of errors."
"A graphic user interface can be added."
"Lacks some functional requirements."
"This solution needs better management UI."
"It is of great concern to us that the solution is not very powerful on cross platform, at it impedes the ability to build and scale with it."
"The solution is difficult to learn if someone is learning it for the first time."
"If AI could be incorporated in Microsoft .NET Framework it would be helpful."
"The runtime environment for ASP.NET needs improvement to make it more universal."
"The .NET open source community could be larger."
"This solution should include Power BI so that we don't have to use any third-party tools."
"The initial setup is complex."
"Microsoft could improve .NET Framework by providing more resources to help users understand the solution."
More JBoss Enterprise Application Platform Pricing and Cost Advice →
JBoss Enterprise Application Platform is ranked 9th in Application Infrastructure with 6 reviews while Microsoft .NET Framework is ranked 4th in Application Infrastructure with 47 reviews. JBoss Enterprise Application Platform is rated 9.0, while Microsoft .NET Framework is rated 8.4. The top reviewer of JBoss Enterprise Application Platform writes "A stable and scalable solution that provides excellent technical support with a good response time". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Microsoft .NET Framework writes "Intuitive, easier to develop, maintain, and migrate from the old framework to newer versions". JBoss Enterprise Application Platform is most compared with IBM WebSphere Application Server, Apache Web Server, IBM BPM and NGINX Plus, whereas Microsoft .NET Framework is most compared with IIS, Magic xpa Application Platform, Apache Web Server, Windows Process Activation Services and WebLogic Suite. See our JBoss Enterprise Application Platform vs. Microsoft .NET Framework report.
See our list of best Application Infrastructure vendors.
We monitor all Application Infrastructure reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.