We performed a comparison between Microsoft .NET Framework and Windows Process Activation Services based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, F5, Apache and others in Application Infrastructure."I like that ASP.NET is used for the framework and the core web services."
"A great solution for creating program solutions in a framework for Microsoft Windows quickly and easily."
"The technology is very scalable and accessible to use."
"It facilitated the streamlined scheduling process by amalgamating inputs from various sources, including location data and other systems."
"The web development and Microsoft Windows service development capabilities are among the most valuable features offered by the Microsoft .NET Framework. This language platform is highly user-friendly, with plenty of online examples and information available, as well as a robust development environment."
"Basically, .NET is simply is the easiest programming language to use, based on my experience."
"The solution is not limited in storage, is customizable and simple to use."
"In-built refactoring and .Net profilers are the most valuable features of the solution."
"The most valuable aspect of the solution is the central console, that allows you to see all of the activated and deactivated computers."
"In my opinion, this solution can be improved by providing out-of-the-box support for different types of libraries."
"Difficult to scale this product for large organizations."
"You need to have the technical expertise to use this product."
"Lacking in auto-scaling."
"This solution is best used with some training."
"They should have more training materials available that are specific to .NET. We spend a lot of money training our engineers."
"The solution has difficulty integrating with other products. There are no such difficulties if you have the same platform, hardware, and operating system."
"It is of great concern to us that the solution is not very powerful on cross platform, at it impedes the ability to build and scale with it."
"The stability of the solution needs improvement."
Earn 20 points
Microsoft .NET Framework is ranked 4th in Application Infrastructure with 47 reviews while Windows Process Activation Services is ranked 23rd in Application Infrastructure. Microsoft .NET Framework is rated 8.4, while Windows Process Activation Services is rated 4.0. The top reviewer of Microsoft .NET Framework writes "Intuitive, easier to develop, maintain, and migrate from the old framework to newer versions". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Windows Process Activation Services writes "Central console enables us to see all of the activated and deactivated computers but it has poor alerts and frustrating technical support". Microsoft .NET Framework is most compared with IIS, Magic xpa Application Platform, JBoss Enterprise Application Platform, Apache Web Server and WebLogic Suite, whereas Windows Process Activation Services is most compared with IIS.
See our list of best Application Infrastructure vendors.
We monitor all Application Infrastructure reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.