We performed a comparison between JenniferSoft and New Relic based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Datadog, Dynatrace, New Relic and others in Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability."The dashboard is a valuable feature."
"The most important thing is that it tells us where the latency in throughput and response time are."
"They have baseline level alerting."
"The deep insights, which will give you the metrics (not a high level), so we can build out at the database level where the bottleneck is. This has been pretty helpful."
"The solution is good for sending alerts, drawing graphs about system usage, and creating plug-ins."
"The most valuable feature is the ability to receive in-depth information about applications. It can detect a lot of important information."
"Every time there is a crisis, high traffic, or if we see a problem with a server, we go to New Relic and monitor it to determine the cause."
"The most valuable feature is the New Relic APM module to deep-dive into the application, to get bottlenecks to the surface, and to improve application performance. Also, the New Relic Insights module creates a real-time dashboard on application performance to create awareness for the DevOps team."
"It has helped my organization to dive deeper into the application using the APM module is very helpful."
"The solution is pricy and has room for improvement."
"New Relic APM is a good tool, and it has a database of failures, but it could use a list of customer-specific failures. New Relic APM should be able to give my company advanced analytics through AI."
"One thing that we noticed was that historical information was only for a limited period, which was not helpful in certain scenarios. For example, if I want to size my system for an event for New Year or Christmas season based on the historical data, I won't be able to find the historical data. Currently, the data is limited to three months. It would be helpful if they can provide historical data for a longer duration so that we can plan our system accordingly."
"It gives you amazing statistics, but doesn’t give you enough information about what to do with the statistics."
"Compared to their competitors, they are missing some features at the moment."
"It is a serious tool and requires a lot of time invested in order to understand how it works."
"The monitoring is only as good as the alerts that it produces. By having it set up fine grain alerting, it is a bit of a pain."
"The browser isn't exactly reliable."
"New Relic APM can improve the information when we dig deeper to check a problem. There should be more detailed information provided."
JenniferSoft is ranked 52nd in Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability with 1 review while New Relic is ranked 3rd in Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability with 152 reviews. JenniferSoft is rated 8.0, while New Relic is rated 8.6. The top reviewer of JenniferSoft writes "Easy to deploy, stable, and scalable". On the other hand, the top reviewer of New Relic writes "Has a simple user interface and end-to-end monitoring and self-healing features". JenniferSoft is most compared with Grafana, whereas New Relic is most compared with Dynatrace, Datadog, Elastic Observability, Grafana and Prometheus.
See our list of best Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability vendors.
We monitor all Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.